Effect of oxygen amendments and soil pH on bioremediation of industrially contaminated soils

Energy Sources

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 233-242

  Joshi, Medha M ^a   Lee, Sunggyu ^a  

^a The University of Akron   (United States)

Author keywords

Acinetobacter sp.; Bioremediation; Extraction chromatography; High performance liquid chromatography; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Indexed keywords

AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS; BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION; COAL BYPRODUCTS; CONTAMINATION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; OXYGEN; PACKED BEDS; PH; SOIL POLLUTION; SOILS;

BIOREMEDIATION; COAL CONVERSION PROCESSES; COAL PLANT; EXTRACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; OXYGEN AMENDMENTS; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS;

INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT;

EID: 0030125437     PISSN: 00908312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00908319608908763     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American Society of Agronomy. 1986. Methods of soil analysis, part 2: chemical and microbiological properties. Method 3540. Madison, Wisconsin.
2. Bioremediation beats waste at Texas superfund site. June 1993. Civil Engineering, 17-18.
3. Cerny, J., H. Pavlikova, and V. Machovic. 1990. Compound-class fractionation of coal-derived liquids by extrography. Fuel 69(August):966-971.
4. Dagley, S. 1981. New perspectives in aromatic catabolism. In Microbial degradation of xenobiotics and recalcitrant compounds, ed. T. Leisinger, A. M. Cook, Mutter, and J. Nuesch, 181-186. New York: Academic Press.
5. Dhawan, S., L. E. Erickson, and L. T. Fan. 1993. Model development and simulation of bioremediation in soil beds with aggregates. Ground Water 31(2):271-284.
6. Ellis, W. D., J. R. Payne, and G. D. McNabb. Nov. 1985. Treatment of Contaminated Soils with Aqueous Surfactants. EPA/600/2-85/129. Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory, Office of Research & Development U.S. EnviroomentaJ Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
7. Environmental Protection Agency. 1962. Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in municipal and industrial discharges, Method 610. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research & Development, Cincinnati, OH.
8. Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Remediation technologies screening matrix and reference guide. Version I, July, EPA 542-B-93-005.
9. Grady, C. P., Jr. 1969. In Biotechnology Application in Hazardous Waste Treatment, ed G. Lewandowski, 81-93. New York: Engineering Foundation.
10. Granda, M., J. Bermejo, S. R. Muinelo, and R. Menendez. 1990. Application of extrography for characterization of coal tar and petroleum pitches. Fuel 69(June):702-705.
11. Grasso, D. (Aug. 1993) Hazardous waste site remediation source control. University of Connecticut/U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Course.
12. Gratzfeld-Husgen, A., R. Schuster and Helmut Schulenberg-Schell. 1992. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by HPLC. Hewlett Packard. Application Note.
13. Hicks, B. N., and J. A. Caplan. 1993. Bioremediation: A natural solution. Pollution Engineering 25(2):30-33.
14. Levin, M. A., and M. A. Gealt. 1993. Biotreament of industrial and hazardous waste. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Rittmann, B. E. 1992. A critical review of in situ bioremediation. Gas Research Institute, Chicago.
16. St.-Cyr, M., C. H. Nelson, and C. T. Hawke. 1992. Bioremediation treats contaminated soils in Canadian winter. Environmental Technology for Refiners, Oil & Gas Journal, OGJ Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. In Laboratory manual far physical/chemical methods, Vol. 1B. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1982.
17. Thayer, A. M. 1991. Bioremediation: Innovative technology for cleaning up hazardous waste. C & E News 69(34):24-44.
18. M. D. 1990. Bioremediation of petroleum spills in Arctic and Subarctic environments: A feasibility study. U.S. Deportment of Commerce, Report #AK RD-90-12.