Light source-induced error in computer-assisted image analysis with a video-based system

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 491-497

  Stutz, Felix A ^a,b,c   Hefti, Arthur F ^a,d   Gibbs, Charles H ^e  

^a University of Florida ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science   (United States)

^d Center for Alcohol Research   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGHT; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; RADIODENSITOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; VIDEORECORDING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTIFACTS; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; HUMANS; LIGHT; LIGHTING; MANDIBLE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 0030124142     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80030-8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ruttimann UE, Webber RL, Schmidt E. A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 1986;21:486-95.
2. Ohki M, Okano T, Yamada N. A contrast-correction method for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 1988;23:277-80.
3. Bragger U, Pasquali L, Rylander H, Carnes D, Kornman KS. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:27-37.
4. Reddy MS, Bruch JM, Jeffcoat MK, Williams RC. Contrast enhancement as an aid to interpretation in digital subtraction radiography. ORAL SURO ORAL MED ORAL PATHOL 1991;71:763-9.
5. Rosling B, Hollender L, Nyman S, Olsson G. A radiographic method for assessing changes in alveolar bone height following periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:211-7.
6. McHenry K, Hausmann E, Wikesjö U, Dunford R, Lyon E, Christersson L. Methodological aspects and quantitative adjuncts to computerized subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 1987;22:125-32.
7. Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and a x-ray-beam manipulator. J Periodontol 1991;62:674-83.
8. Carpio LC, Hausmann E, Dunford RG, Allen KM, Christersson LA. Evaluation of a simple modified radiographic alignment system for routine use. J Periodontol 1994;65:62-7.
9. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS, Webber RL, Williams RC, Ruttimann UE. Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 1987;22:396-402.
10. Ludlow JB, Peleaux CP. Comparison of stent versus laserand cephalostat-aligned periapical film-positioning techniques for use in digital subtraction radiography. ORAL SURG ORAL MED ORAL PATHOL 1994;77:208-15.
11. Janssen PTM, van Palenstein-Helderman WH, van Aken J. The effect of in vivo-occuring errors in the reproducibility of radiographs on the use of the subtraction technique. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:53-8.
12. Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J. Time-related changes of in vivo projections errors in standardized radiographs. J Periodontol 1993;64:278-84.
13. Allen KM, Hausmann E, Kutlubay ME, et al. Studies of the angular reproducibility of positioning patients adjacent to an x-ray tube: 1. stent-rod based and extra-oral systems. J Periodontal Res 1994;29:174-8.
14. Benn DK. Limitations of the digital image subtraction technique in assessing alveolar bone crest changes due to misalignment errors during image capture. DentomaxillofacRadiol 1990;19:97-104.
15. Steffensen B, Pasquali LA, Yuan C, Wood RC, Schoolfield JD, Kornman KS. Correction of density changes caused by methodological errors in CADIA. J Periodontal Res 1989;24:402-8.
16. Zubery Y, Dove B, Ebersole J. An in vitro study of the characteristics of a computer-aided radiographic evaluation (CARE) system for longitudinal assessment of density changes. J Periodontal Res 1993;28:233-40.
17. Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW, Pilgram TK, Shrout MK. Quantitative evaluation of digital radiograph imaging systems. ORAL SURG ORAL MED ORAL PATHOL 1990;70:661-8.
18. Shrout MK, Potter BJ, Yurgalavage HM, Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. ORAL SURG ORAL MED ORAL PATHOL 1993;76:502-9.
19. Scheffé H. A method of judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 1953;40:87-104.
20. Fisher RA. Theory of statistical estimation. Proc Cambr Phil Soc 1925;22:700-25.
21. Glunskin E. Discussion of the voltage/current characteristic of a fluorescent lamp. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Proceedings 1989;136:229-32.