Privacy and autonomy: From Warren and Brandeis to Roe and Cruzan

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 121-135

  Halper, Thomas ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Abortion; Autonomy; Charles Warren; Cruzan v. Director; Griswold v. Connecticut; In re Quinlan; Louis Brandeis; Missouri Department of Health; Privacy; Right to die; Roe v. Wade; Supreme Court

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRUZAN V. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; FEMALE; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; GRISWOLD V. CONNECTICUT; HUMAN; IN RE QUINLAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL LIABILITY; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PREGNANCY; PRIVACY; RIGHT TO DIE; ROE V. WADE; THERAPEUTIC ABORTION; UNITED STATES;

CRUZAN V. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; GRISWOLD V. CONNECTICUT; IN RE QUINLAN; LEGAL APPROACH; ROE V. WADE;

ABORTION, LEGAL; DISCLOSURE; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMANS; LIABILITY, LEGAL; MALE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PREGNANCY; PRIVACY; RIGHT TO DIE; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030123971     PISSN: 03605310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jmp/21.2.121     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anastaplo, G.: 1977, 'The public interest in privacy: Becoming and being human,' DePaul Law Review 26, pp. 767-806.
2. Annas, G., Glantz, L. H., and Mariner, W. K.: 1990, 'The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship,' Journal of the American Medical Association 263, pp. 858-61.
3. Aristotle: 1963, Nicomachean Ethics, vol. IX, Book 9, W. D. Ross (trans.), Oxford University Press, London, UK.
4. Beardsley, E. L.: 1971, 'Privacy: Autonomy and selective disclosure,' in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, Atherton Press, New York, pp. 56-70.
5. Benn, S. I.: 1971, 'Privacy, freedom, and respect for persons,' in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, Atherton Press, New York, pp. 1-26.
6. Bloustein, E. J.: 1968, 'Privacy, tort law, and the Constitution: Is Warren and Brandeis's tort petty and unconstitutional as well?' Texas Law Review 46, pp. 611-629.
7. Bork, R.: 1990, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law, Free Press, New York.
8. Breithaupt v. Abram: 352 U.S. 432 (1957).
9. Buck v. Bell: 274 U.S. 200 (1927).
10. Carroll, L.: 1962, Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass, Grosset and Dunlap, New York.
11. Cruzan v. Director Missouri Department of Health: 497 U.S. 261 (1990).
12. Diaz v. Oakland Tribune: 188 Cal. Rptr. 762 (App.) (1983).
13. Ely, J. H.: 1973, 'The wages of crying wolf: Comment on Roe v. Wade,' Yale Law Journal 82, pp. 920-949.
14. Freeman, A. D. and Mensch, E.: 1987, 'The public-private distinction in American law and life,' Buffalo Law Review 36, pp. 237-257.
15. Freud, S.: 1962, Civilization and Its Discontents, J. Strachey (ed. and trans.), Norton, New York.
16. Fried, C.: 1970, An Anatomy of Values: Problems of Personal and Social Choice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
17. Ginsburg, R. B.: 1985, 'Some thoughts on autonomy and equality in relation to Roe v. Wade,' North Caroline Law Review, 63, pp. 375-86.
18. Gostin, L. and Weir, R. F.: 1991, 'Life and death choices after Cruzan: Case law and standards of professional conduct,' Milbank Quarterly 69, pp. 143-173.
19. Gross, H.: 1971, 'Privacy and autonomy,' in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, Atherton Press, New York, pp. 169-181.
20. Hamberger v. Eastman: 106 N.H. 107, 206 A.2d 239 (1964).
21. Hart H. L. A.: 1963, Law, Liberty, and Morality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
22. Hendin, H. and Klerman, G.: 1993, 'Physician - assisted suicide: The dangers of legalization,' American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, pp. 143-145.
23. Hobbes, T.: 1962, Leviathan, Michael Oakeshott (ed.), Collier Books, New York.
24. Humphrey, D.: 1991, Final Exit: The Practicalities of Self-Deliverance and Assisted Suicide for the Dying, Hemlock Society, Eugene, OR.
25. Quinlan, In re, 70 N.J. 10, 355 A. 2d 647 (1976).
26. Jourard, S. M.: 1966, 'Some psychological aspects of privacy,' Law and Contemporary Problems 31, pp. 307-341.
27. Kass, L. R.: 1989, 'Neither for love nor money: Why doctors must not kill,' Public Interest, no. 94, pp. 25-46.
28. Locke, J.: 1960, Two Treatises of Government, Peter Laslett (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. Merton, R.: 1968, Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, New York.
30. Moore, B.: 1984, Privacy: Studies in Social and Cultural History, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
31. Neff, C. L.: 1991, 'Woman, womb, and bodily integrity,' Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 3, pp. 327-353.
32. Noonan, J. T., Jr.: 1984, 'The root and branch of Roe v. Wade,' Nebraska Law Review 63, pp. 668-679.
33. Packard, V.: 1964, The Naked Society, McKay, New York.
34. Petchesky, R. P.: 1985, Abortion and Woman's Choice: The State, Sexuality, and Reproductive Freedom, Longman, New York.
35. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: 112, S. Ct. 2791 (1992).
36. Roe v. Wade: 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
37. Shils, E.: 1966, 'Privacy: Its constitution and vicissitudes,' Law and Contemporary Problems 31, pp. 282-306.
38. Simmel, A.: 1971, 'Privacy is not an isolated freedom,' in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, Atherton Press, New York, pp. 71-87.
39. Simmel, G.: 1950. The Sociology of George Simmel, K. Wolff (ed. and trans.), Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.
40. Slater, P.: 1976, The Pursuit of Loneliness: American Culture at the Breaking Point, Beacon Press, Boston.
41. Union Pacific Railway v. Botsford: 141 U.S. 250 (1891).
42. Warren, S. D. and Brandeis, L. D.: 1890 'The right to privacy,' Harvard Law Review 4, pp. 193-220.
43. Weinstein, W. L.: 1971, 'The uses of privacy in the good life,' in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, Atherton Press, New York, pp. 27-55.