Bandwidth limitation effects on low-frequency impulse noise prediction and assessment

Applied Acoustics

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 331-344

  Kerry, G ^a   Ford, R D ^a   James, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; FREQUENCIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NOISE ABATEMENT; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

BANDWIDTH LIMITATION EFFECTS; LOW FREQUENCY IMPULSE NOISE;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

EID: 0030123445     PISSN: 0003682X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0003-682X(95)00039-C     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. US Environmental Protection Agency, Information on the levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety. Report 550/9-74-004, 1974.
2. Siskind, D. E., Stachura, V. J., Stage, M. S. & Kopp, J. W., Structure response and damage produced by airblast from surface mining. US Bureau of Mines RI 8485.
3. Richmond, D. R. & Damon, E. G., Biomedical effects of impulse noise. Norwegian Defence Construction Service note 209/93.
4. Health and Safety, The Noise at Work Regulations. Statutory Instrument No. 1790, 1989.
5. Crocker, M. J. & Sutherland, L. C., Instrumentation requirements for measurement of sonic boom and blast waves - a theoretical study. J. Sound. Vib., 7(3) (1968) 351-70.
6. Schomer, P. D., Wagner, L. R., Benson, L. J., Buchta, E. & Hirsch, K. W., Human and community response to military sounds: Results from field-laboratory tests of small-arms, tracked vehicle, and blast sounds. Noise Control Engng J. 42(2) (1994) Mar-Apr, 71-84.
7. Proposal for a Council Directive on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents. Official J. European Communities No. C77, 18.3 (1993) 12.
8. Specification for sound level meters. British Standard, BS EN60651, 1994.