Failure of a hydroxyapatite-coated endosteal dental implant: A clinical report

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 353-355

  Taylor, James C ^a,b   Driscoll, Carl F ^a   Cunningham, Michael D ^a  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DURAPATITE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 0030118351     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90023-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Golec TS, Krauser JT. Long-term retrospective studies on hydroxyapatite coated endosteal and subperiosteal implants. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:39-65.
2. Jarcho M. Retrospective analysis of hydroxylapatite development for oral implant applications. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:19-26.
3. de Bruijn JD, Klein CP, de Groot K, van Blitterswijk CA. The ultrastructure of the bone-hydroxyapatite interface in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:1382-92.
4. Osborn JF, Newesly H. Dynamic aspects of the implant-bone interface: dental implants, materials and systems. München, Germany: Hanser Verlag, 1980.
5. Meffert RM, Block MS, Kent JN. What is osseointegration? Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1987;7:9-21.
6. Kay JF. Calcium phosphate coatings: understanding the chemistry and biology and their effective use. Compendium 1993;14(suppl 15):S520-5.
7. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Ivarsson B, Jönsson U. Ultrastructural analysis of the interface zone of titanium and gold implants. Adv Biomater 1982;4:167-77.
8. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, et al. The interface zone of inorganic implants in vivo. Ann Biomed Eng 1983;11:1-27.
9. Steinemann SG, Eulenberger J, Maeusli PA, Schroeder A. Adhesion of bone to titanium. Adv Biomater 1986;6:409-14.
10. Listgarten MA, Buser D, Steinemann SG, Donath K, Lang NP, Weber HP. Light and transmission electron microscopy of the intact interfaces between non-submerged titanium-coated epoxy-resin implants and bone or gingiva. J Dent Res 1992;71:364-71.
11. Block MS, Kent JN, Kay JF. Evaluation of hydroxylapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:601-7.
12. Cook SD, Kay JF, Thomas KA, Jarcho M. Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxylapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:15-22.
13. Hong L, Xu HC, de Groot K. Tensile strength of the interface between hydroxyapatite and bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:7-18.
14. Niki M, Ito A, Matsuda T, Ogino M. Comparative push-out data of bioactive and non-bioactive materials of similar rugosity: the bone-biomaterials interface. In: Davies JE, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press 1991:350-6.
15. Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Lekovic V, Beumer J III, Moy PK, Lewis S. Histomorphometry of bone apposition around three types of endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:491-6.
16. Gottlander M, Albrektsson T, Carlsson LV. A histomorphometric study of unthreaded hydroxylapatite-coated and titanium-coated implants in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:485-90.
17. Carlsson L, Regner L, Johansson C, Gottlander M, Herberts P. Bone response to hydroxyapatite-coated and commercially pure titanium implants in the human arthritic knee. J Orthop Res 1994;12:274-85.
18. Gottlander M. On hard tissue reaction to hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants [Dissertation]. Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University, 1994.
19. Kirsch A. In panel discussion: Solutions for specific soft tissue situation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9(suppl):30-8.
20. Babbush C. In panel discussion: Solutions for specific bone situations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9(suppl):19-29.
21. Gonshor A. In panel discussion: Experience with multiple endosseous implant systems in private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9(suppl):10-8.
22. Johnson BW. HA-coated dental implants: long term consequences. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992;20:33-41.
23. Gross UM, Muller-Mai C, Voigt C. Comparative morphology of the bone interface with glass ceramics, bydroxyapatite and natural coral: the bone-biomaterials interface. In: Davies JE, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991:308-20.
24. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, et al. The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapatite on bone remodeling in relation to porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implants in the dog. J Dent Res 1991; 70:1338-45.
25. Frayssinet P, Hardy D, Rouquet N, Giamarra B, Guilhem A, Hanker J. New observations on middle term hydroxyapatite-coated titanium alloy hip prostheses. Biomaterials 1992;13:668-74.
26. Moavenian S. Soft tissue interface of implants with various surface characteristics. In: Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on implant dentistry. J PROSTHET DENT 1994;72:623-34.