Effects of a doubled orthodontic force magnitude on tooth movement and root resorptions. An inter-individual study in adolescents

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 141-150

  Owman Moll, Py ^a   Kurol, Jüri ^b   Lundgren, Dan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b INSTITUTE FOR POSTGRADUATE DENTAL EDUCATION   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; BICUSPID; CHILD; DENTAL MODELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLA; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ROOT RESORPTION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH MOVEMENT;

EID: 0030117735     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/18.2.141     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andreasen G, Johnson P 1967 Lxperimental findings on tooth movements under two conditions of applied force. Angle Orthodontist 37: 9-12
2. Andreasen G F, Zwanziger D 1980 A clinical evaluation of the differential force concept as applied to the edgewise bracket. American Journal of Orthodontics 78: 25-40
3. Bench R W, Hilgers J J, Gugino C F 1978 Bioprogressive therapy Part 6. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 12: 123-139
4. Booster C H, Johnston L E 1974 A clinical investigation of the concepts of differential and optimal force in canine retraction. Angle Orthodontist 44: 113-119
5. Burstone C J 1985 Application of bioengineering to clinical orthodontics In: Graber T M, Swain B F (eds) Orthodontics. Current principles and techniques. C V Mosby Company. St Louis, pp. 193-227
6. Burstone C J, Groves M H 1961 Threshold and optimum force values for maxillary anterior tooth movement. Journal of Dental Research 39: 695 (Abstract)
7. Henry J L, Weinmann J P 1951 The pattern of resorption and repair of human cementum. Journal of the American Dental Association 42: 270-290
8. Hixon E H, Atikian H, Callow G E, McDonald H W, Tacy R J 1969 Optimal force. differential force and anchorage. American Journal of Orthodontics 55: 437-457
9. Hixon E H, Aasen T O, Arango J, Clark R A, Klosterman R, Miller S S, Odom W M 1970 On force and tooth movement. American Journal of Orthodontics 57: 476-489
10. Jepsen A 1963 Root surface measurement and a method for x-ray determination of root surface area. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 21: 36-46
11. King G J, Fischlschweiger W 1982 The effect of force magnitude on extractable bone resorption activity and cementum cratering in orthodontic tooth movement. Journal of Dental Research 61: 773-779
12. Kurol J, Franke P, Lundgren D, Owman-Moll P 1995a Force magnitude applied by orthodontists. An inter and intra-individual study. European Journal of Orthodontics (in press)
13. Kurol J, Owman-Moll P, Lundgren D 1995b Time-related root resorptions after application of a controlled continuous orthodontic force. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (in press)
14. Kvam E 1972 Scanning electron microscopy of tissue changes on the pressure surface of human premolars following tooth movement. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 80: 357-368
15. Linge B O, Linge L 1980 Apikale Wurzelresorptionen der oberen Frontzahne. Eine longitudinale röntgenologische Untersuchung in einer kieferorthopädischen Praxis. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 41: 276-288
16. Linge B O, Linge L 1983 Apical root resorption in upper anterior teeth. European Journal of Orthodontics 5: 173-183
17. Lundgren D, Owman-Moll P, Kurol J 1995a Early tooth movement pattern after application of a controlled continuous orthodontic force. A human experimental model. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (in press)
18. Lundgren D, Owman-Moll P, Kurol J, Mårtensson B 1995b Accuracy of orthodontic force and tooth movement measurements British Journal of Orthodontics (in press)
19. Maltha J C, Kuljpers-Jagtman A M, Pilon J J G M 1993 Relation between force magnitude and orthodontic tooth movement. European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 452 (Abstract)
20. Massler M, Malone A J 1954 Root resorption in human permanent teeth. A radiographic study. American Journal of Orthodontics 40: 619-633
21. Reitan K 1957 Some factors determining the evaluation of forces in orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics 43: 33-45
22. Reitan K 1960 Tissue behavior during orthodontic tooth movement. American Journal of Orthodontics 46: 881-899
23. Reitan K 1964 Effects of force magnitude and direction of tooth movement on different alveolar bone types. American Journal of Orthodontics 34: 244-255
24. Reitan K 1974 Initial tissue behavior during apical root resorption. Angle Orthodontist 44: 68-82
25. Reitan K 1985 Biomechanical principles and reactions. In: Graber T M, Swain B F (eds) Orthodontics Current principles and techniques. C V Mosby Company, St. Louis, pp. 101-192
26. Rygh P, Bowling K, Hovlansdal L, Williams S 1986 Activation of the vascular system: a main mediator of periodontal fiber remodeling in orthodontic tooth movement. American Journal of Orthodontics 89: 453-468
27. Schwarz A M 1932 Tissue changes incidental to orthodontic tooth movement. International Journal of Orthodontics 18: 331-352
28. Smith R, Storey E 1952 The importance of force in orthodontics. Australian Journal of Dentistry 56: 291-304
29. Stenvik A, Mjör I 1970 Pulp and dentin reactions to experimental tooth intrusion: a histologic study of the initial changes. American Journal of Orthodontics 57: 370-385
30. Storey E, Smith R 1952 Force in orthodontics and its relation to tooth movement. Australian Journal of Dentistry 56: 11-18
31. Vardimon A D, Gaber T M, Voss L R, Lenk J 1991 Determinations controlling iatrogenic external root resorption and repair during and after palatal expansion. Angle Orthodontics 61: 113-124
32. VonderAhe G 1973 Postretention status of maxillary incisors with root-end resorptions. Angle Orthodontist 43: 247-255
33. Zachrisson B U 1976 Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and supporting structures during orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 69: 285-300