Balanced-growth-consistent recursive utility

Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 657-680

  Dolmas, Jim ^a  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Balanced growth; Endogenous growth; Recursive utility

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030117305     PISSN: 01651889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1889(95)00869-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barro, R. and X. Sala-i-Martin, 1992, Public finance in models of economic growth, Review of Economic Studies 59, 645-661.
2. Becker, R.A. and J.H. Boyd III, 1983, Recursive utility: Discrete time theory, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 34, 49-98.
3. Benhabib, J., S. Jafarey, and K. Nishimura, 1990, The dynamics of efficient intertemporal allocations with many agents, recursive preferences and production, Journal of Economic Theory 44, 301-320.
4. Benhabib, J., M. Majumdar, and K. Nishimura, 1987, Global equilibrium dynamics with stationary recursive preferences, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 8, 429-452.
5. Blackorby, C., D. Primont, and R. Russell, 1978, Duality, separability and functional structure (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
6. Boyd, J.H. III, 1990, Recursive utility and the Ramsey problem, Journal of Economic Theory 50, 326-345.
7. Brock, W.A. and D. Gale, 1969, Optimal growth factor augmenting progress, Journal of Economic Theory 1, 229-243.
8. Chamley, C., 1986, Optimal taxation of capital income in general equilibrium with infinite lives, Econometrica 54, 607-622.
9. Clarke, F.H., 1983, Optimization and nonsmooth analysis, Canadian Mathematical Society series of monographs and advanced texts (Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY).
10. Dolmas, J., 1994, Balanced-growth-consistent recursive utility, Richard B. Johnson Center for Economic Studies working paper no. 9415 (Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX).
11. Epstein, L.G. and S. Zin, 1989, Substitution, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset pricing: A theoretical framework, Econometrica 57, 937-969.
12. Jones, L.E. and R. Manuelli, 1990, A convex model of equilibrium growth: Theory and policy implications, Journal of Political Economy 98, 1008-1038.
13. King, R.G. and S. Rebelo, 1990, Public policy and economic growth: Developing neoclassical implications, Journal of Political Economy 98, S126-S150.
14. Koopmans, T.C., 1960, Stationary ordinal utility and impatience, Econometrica 28, 387-309.
15. Lucas, R.E., Jr., 1978, Asset prices in an exchange economy, Econometrica 46, 1429-1445.
16. Lucas, R.E., Jr., 1988, On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3-42.
17. Lucas, R.E., Jr. and N.L. Stokey, 1984, Optimal growth with many consumers, Journal of Economic Theory 32, 139-171.
18. McKenzie, L.W., 1986, Optimal economic growth, turnpike theorems and comparative dynamics, in: K.J. Arrow and M.D. Intriligator, eds., Handbook of mathematical economics, Vol. 3 (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
19. Obstfeld, M., 1982, Aggregate spending and the terms of trade: Is there a Laursen-Metzler effect?, Quarterly Journal of Economics 97, 251-270.
20. Rebelo, S., 1991, Long-run policy analysis and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy 99, 500-521.
21. Rockafellar, R.T., 1974, Conjugate duality and optimization, Conference board of mathematical sciences series no. 16 (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA).
22. Sorger, G., 1992, Minimum impatience theorems for recursive economic models, Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems no. 390 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
23. Weitzman, M., 1973, Duality theory for infinite horizon convex models, Management Science 19, 783-789.