|
Volumn 109, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 393-402
|
The decision to extract: part II. Analysis of clinicians' stated reasons for extraction.
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CEPHALOMETRY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
DECISION MAKING;
DENTAL CARE;
ESTHETICS;
EVALUATION;
FACE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INCIDENCE;
INCISOR;
MALE;
MALOCCLUSION;
MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
ODONTOMETRY;
ORTHODONTICS;
PATHOLOGY;
PATIENT COMPLIANCE;
PERIODONTAL DISEASE;
PHOTOGRAPHY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
STATISTICS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
CEPHALOMETRY;
DECISION MAKING;
DENTAL MODELS;
ESTHETICS;
ESTHETICS, DENTAL;
EVALUATION STUDIES;
FACE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INCIDENCE;
INCISOR;
MALE;
MALOCCLUSION;
MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I;
MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II;
MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
ODONTOMETRY;
ORTHODONTICS;
PATIENT COMPLIANCE;
PERIODONTAL DISEASES;
PHOTOGRAPHY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
SERIAL EXTRACTION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 0030117304
PISSN: 08895406
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70121-X Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (51)
|
References (0)
|