Interventions in Response to Chemically Dependent Nurses: Effect of Context and Interpretation

Research in Nursing and Health

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 153-162

  Torkelson, Diane J ^a   Anderson, Ruth A ^b   McDaniel Jr , Reuben R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ARTICLE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALPRACTICE; NURSE ADMINISTRATOR; NURSING STAFF; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

COMMUNICATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMANS; NURSE ADMINISTRATORS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; PROFESSIONAL IMPAIRMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030116785     PISSN: 01606891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199604)19:2<153::AID-NUR7>3.0.CO;2-L     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. American Hospital Association. (1992). 1991 report of the hospital nursing personnel survey. Chicago: Author.
2. American Nurses' Association. (1984). Addictions and psychological dysfunctions in nursing: The profession's response to the problem. Kansas City: Author.
3. American Nurses' Association. (1987, March). Impaired nursing practice. American Nurses Association News. Kansas City: Author.
4. Bantel, K.A., & Jackson, S.E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124.
5. Billings, R.S., Milburn, T.W., & Schaalman, M.L. (1980). A model of crisis perception: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 300-316.
6. Cannon, B., & Brown, J. (1988). Nurses' attitudes toward impaired colleagues. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 20, 96-101.
7. Certo-Guinan, M., & Waite, L. (1991). The director of nursing and the chemically dependent nurse. Nursing Management, 22, 52-54.
8. Comstock, D.E., & Scott, W.R. (1977). Technology and the structure of subunits: Distinguishing individual and workgroup effects. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 177-202.
9. Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191-233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
10. Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organization information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
11. Daft, R.L., & Weick, K.E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295.
12. Dutton, J.E., & Duncan, R.B. (1987). The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 279-295.
13. Dutton, J.E., Fahey, L., & Narayanan, U.K. (1983). Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 307-323.
14. Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206.
15. Jackson, S.E., & Dutton, J.E. (1988). Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 370-387.
16. Keller, R.T. (1994). Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 167-179.
17. Keller, R.T., Slocum, J.W., & Susman, G.I. (1974). Uncertainty and type of management system in continuous process organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 56-68.
18. Kumar, N., Stern, L.W., & Anderson, J.C. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1633-1651.
19. Lachicotte, L., & Alexander, J. (1990). Management attitudes and nurse impairment. Nursing Management, 21, 102-114.
20. Lazarus, R.S. (1966). Psvchological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hil).
21. Leatt, P., & Schnick, P. (1982). Technology, size, environment, and structure in nursing subunits. Organizational Studies, 3, 221-243.
22. Lippman, H. (1992). Addicted nurses: Tolerated, tormented, or treated? RN, 55, 36-41.
23. Locke, E.A., & Schweiger, D.M. (1979). Participation in decision-making. One more look. In B.M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 265-339). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
24. Lyles, M.A., & Mitroff, I.I. (1980). Organizational problem formulation: An empirical study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 102-119.
25. Milliken, F.J. (1990). Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: An examination of college administrators' interpretation of changing demographics. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 42-63.
26. National League of Nursing. 1991. Nursing datasource 1991, Vol. III. New York: Author.
27. Noble, K.A., & Rancourt, R. (1991). Administrative and intradisciplinary conflict within nursing. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 15, 36-42.
28. O'Reilly, C.A., & Roberts, K.H. (1977). Task group structure, communication, and effectiveness in three organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 674-681.
29. Schaffer, S. (1988). Attitudes and perceptions held by impaired nurses. Nursing Management, 19, 46-50.
30. Seidler, J. (1974). On using informants: A technique for collecting quantitative data and controlling measurement error in organization analysis. American Sociological Review, 39, 816-831.
31. Shortell, S., Zimmerman, J., Rousseau, D., Gillies, R., Wagner, D., Draper, E., Knaus, W., & Duffy, J. (1994). The performance of intensive care units: Does good management make a difference? Medical Care, 32, 508-525.
32. Smith, G. (1992). Attitudes of nurse managers and assistant nurse managers toward chemically impaired colleagues. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 24, 295-300.
33. Staudenmeier, W. (1989, Fall). Contrasting organizational responses to alcohol and illegal drug abuse among employees. Journal of Drug Issues, 19, 451-471.
34. Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E., & Dutton, J.E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multi-level analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501-524.
35. Thomas, J.B., Clark, S.M., & Gioia, D.A. (1993). Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 239-270.
36. Thomas, J.B., & McDaniel, R.R. (1990). Interpreting strategic issues: Effects of strategy and information structure of top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 286-306.
37. Thomas, J.B., McDaniel, R.R., & Anderson, R.A. (1991). Hospitals as interpretation systems. Health Services Research, 25, 860-879.
38. Thomas, J.B., Shankster, L.J., & Mathieu, J.E. (1994). Antecedents to organizational issue interpretation: The roles of single-level, cross-level, and content cues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1252-1284.
39. Van Doren, M. (1991, February). Assisting impaired nurses: Things an employer should know. Texas Nursing, 9-10.
40. Verran, J., & Mark, B. (1992). Contextual factors influencing patient outcomes individuals/groups/ environment: Interactions and clinical practice Interface. In Patient outcomes research: Examining the effectiveness of nursing practice: Proceedings of the State of the Science Conference (NIH Publication No. 93-3411, pp. 121-142). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.