Evaluation of some implicit time-stepping algorithms for pseudodynamic tests

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 333-355

  Bursi, Oreste S ^a   Shing, Pui Shum B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b University of Colorado at Boulder   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimental errors; Implicit time stepping algorithms; Non linear response; Numerical errors; Pseudodynamic tests; Seismic performance

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FREQUENCIES; ITERATIVE METHODS; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EXPERIMENTAL ERRORS; IMPLICIT TIME STEPPING ALGORITHMS; NEWTON ITERATIONS; NONLINEAR RESPONSE; NUMERICAL DISSIPATION; NUMERICAL ERRORS; OPERATOR SPLITTING TECHNIQUE; PSEUDODYNAMIC TESTS; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE;

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE;

PSEUDODYNAMIC METHOD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; TIME STEPPING ALGORITHM;

EID: 0030114894     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199604)25:4<333::AID-EQE548>3.0.CO;2-M     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. C. R. Thewalt and S. A. Mahin, 'Hybrid solution techniques for generalized pseudodynamic testing', Report No. UCB/EERC-87/09, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, CA, 1987.
2. M. Nakashima, T. Kaminosono, M. Ishida and K. Ando, 'Integration techniques for substructure pseudodynamic test', Proc. 4th U.S. natl conf. earthquake eng., Palm Springs, CA, Vol. II, 1990, pp. 515-524.
3. P. B. Shing, M. T. Vannan and E. Carter, 'Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests', Earthquake eng. struct. dyn. 20, 551-576 (1991).
4. H. M. Hilber, T. J. R. Hughes and R. L. Taylor, 'Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics', Earthquake eng. struct. dyn. 20, 283-292 (1977).
5. T. J. R. Hughes, K. S. Pister and R. L. Taylor, 'Implicit-explicit finite elements in non-linear transient analysis', Comput. methods appl. mech. eng. 17/18, 159-182 (1979).
6. K.-C. Tsai, J.-W. Li and T.-F. Wang, 'Pseudodynamic performance of steel plate energy-dissipating substructures', Proc. 5th U.S. natl conf. earthquake eng., Chicago, IL, Vol. I, 1994, pp. 735-744.
7. O. S. Bursi, P. B. Shing and Z. Radakovic-Guzina, 'Pseudodynamic testing of strain-softening systems with adaptive time steps', Earthquake eng. struct, dyn. 23, 745-760 (1994).
8. F. Seible, G. A. Hegemier, A. Igarashi and G. R. Kingsley, 'Simulated seismic-load tests on full-scale five-story masonry building', J. struct, eng. ASCE 120, 903-924 (1994).
9. P. B. Shing, O. S. Bursi and M. T. Vannan, 'Pseudodynamic tests of a concentrically braced frame using substructuring techniques', J. constr. steel res. 29, 121-148 (1994).
10. P. B. Shing and S. A. Mahin, 'Cumulative experimental errors in pseudodynamic tests', Earthquake eng. struct. dyn. 15, 409-424 (1987).
11. M. Nakashima and H. Kato, 'Experimental error growth behavior and error growth control in on-line computer test control method', Research Paper 123, Building Research Institute, Ministry of Construction, Japan, 1987.
12. R. Peek and W.-H. Yi, 'Error analysis for the pseudodynamic test method, I: analysis', J. eng. mech. ASCE 116, 1618-1637 (1990).
13. R. Peek and W.-H. Yi, 'Error analysis for the pseudodynamic test method, II: application', J. eng. mech. ASCE 116, 1638-1658 (1990).
14. P. B. Shing and M. T. Vannan, 'On the accuracy of an implicit algorithm for pseudodynamic tests', Earthquake eng. struct. dyn. 19, 631-651 (1990).
15. D. Comberscure and P. Pegon, 'Alpha-operator splitting time integration technique for pseudodynamic testing: error propagation analysis', Special Publication, No. I.94.65, CEC, JRC, Ispra, Italy, 1994.
16. M. Nakashima, T. Akazawa and O. Sakaguchi, 'Integration method capable of controlling experimental error growth in substructure pseudo dynamic test', J. struct. constr. eng. AIJ 454, 61-71 (1993).
17. P. B. Shing, O. S. Bursi, Z. Radakovic-Guzina and M. T. Vannan, 'Recent developments in pseudodynamic testing based on an implicit time integration method', U.S.-Japan Seminar on Developments and Future Dimensions of Structural Testing Techniques, Hawaii, 28 June-1 July 1993.
18. W.-H. Yi and R. Peek, 'Posterior time-step adjustment in pseudodynamic testing', J. eng. mech ASCE 119, 1376-1386 (1993).
19. C. Thewalt and M. Roman, 'Performance parameters for pseudodynamic tests', J. struct. eng. ASCE 120, 2768-2781 (1994).
20. O. S. Bursi and P. B. Shing, 'Adaptive time steps and secant-Newton iterations for pseudodynamic testing of strain-softening structures', Proc. 5th U.S. natl conf. earthquake eng., Chicago, IL, Vol. I, 1994, pp. 753-762.
21. M. E. Plesha and T. Belytschko, 'A constitutive operator splitting method for nonlinear transient analysis', Comput. struct. 20, 767-777 (1990).
22. G. M. Hulbert and J. Chung, The unimportance of the spurious root of time integration algorithms for structural dynamics', Commun. numer. methods eng. 10, 591-597 (1994).
23. G. Dahlquist, 'A special stability problem for linear multistep methods', BIT 3, 27-43 (1963).
24. O. S. Bursi and P. B. Shing, 'Evaluation of implicit time-stepping algorithms for pseudodynamic tests', Workshop on Cyclic Damage and Pseudodynamic tests, Naples, Italy, 2-3 June 1994, pp. 159-198.
25. G. Magonette, 'Digital control of pseudodynamic tests', in J. Donea and P. M. Jones (eds), Experimental and Numerical Methods in Earthquake Engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991, pp. 63-99.