Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 71-75

  Hayakawa, Yoshihiko ^a   Farman, A G ^a   Scarfe, W C ^a   Kuroyanagi, K ^b   Rumack, P M ^c   Schick, D B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b TOKYO DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^c Schick Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Radiographic image enhancement; Radiography, dental; Signal processing, computer assiated

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; RADIATION DOSE; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ALUMINUM; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0030112138     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.25.2.9446976     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Gröndahl H-G. Digital radiology in dental diagnosis: a critical view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992; 21: 198-202.
2. Sanderink GCH. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids, Int Dent J 1993: 43: 335-42.
3. Wenzel A. Sensor noise in direct imaging (the RadioVisioGraphy, Sens-A-Ray, and Visualix/Vixa systems) evaluated by sub- traction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77: 70-4.
4. Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Pixel perception and voxel vision. Constructs for a new paradigm in maxillofacial imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 5-9.
5. Kuroyanagi K, Hayakawa Y, New digital imaging system for intraoral radiography. J Jpn Dent Assoc 1994; 47: 129-40 (in Japanese).
6. Mouyen F, Benz C, Sonnabend E, Lodter JP. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68: 238-42.
7. Benz C, Mouyen F. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991 ; 72: 627-31.
8. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Kelly MS. Flash Dent: an alternative charge-coupled device/scintillator-based direct digital intraoral radiographie system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 11-7.
9. Nelvig P, Wing K, Welander U. Sens-A-Ray: a new system for direct digital intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 818-23.
10. Molteni R. Direct digital dental X-ray imaging with Visualix/ VIXA. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 235-43.
11. Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Schick DB, Rumack PM. Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new CCD-based intraoral radiographie system. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 399-404.
12. Harada T, Nishikawa K, Shibuya H, Hayakawa Y. Kuroyanagi K. Sens-A-Ray characteristics with variations in beam quality. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80: 120-3.
13. Takemori T, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25: 17-8.
14. Hayakawa Y, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Kuroyanagi K, Molteni R. Beam quality and image contrast with VIXA-2. Oral Radiol 1995; 11: 31-6.
15. McDonnell D, Price C. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993; 22: 121-6.
16. Kapa SF, Tyndall DA, Ouellette TE. The application of added beam filtration to intra-oral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1990; 19: 67-74.
17. Molteni R. An improved mode to display images from a digital X-ray sensor. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 96-7.
18. Sanderink GCH, Velders XL, Welander U, van der Stelt PF. An evaluation of two new direct digital intraoral sensors, the Siemens Sidexis and the Gendex VIXA-2. for assessing root canal length. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 103-4.