The Contingent Valuation Controversy in Environmental Economics and its Relevance to Health Services Research

Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 116-117

  Johannesson, Magnus ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; SWEDEN;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE SECTOR; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; SWEDEN;

EID: 0030112118     PISSN: 13558196     EISSN: 17581060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/135581969600100210     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 1993; 58: 4601–4614.
2. Portney P R. The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994; 8: 3–17.
3. Hanemann W M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994; 8: 19–43.
4. Diamond D A Hausman J A. Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994; 8: 45–64.