Qualitative hemispheric differences for processing trigrams

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 205-214

  Kim, Hongkeun ^a  

^a Daegu University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030111152     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1996.0013     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bharucha, J. J., Meike, B., & Baird, J. C. 1987. The Macintosh as a user-friendly laboratory for perception and cognition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 19, 131-134.
2. Bub, D. N., & Lewine, J. 1988. Different models of word recognition in the left and right visual fields. Brain and Language, 33, 161-188.
3. Cohen, G. 1973. Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 349-356.
4. Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., & Anderson, C. 1988. Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 35, 254-273.
5. Eng, T. L., & Hellige, J. B. 1994. Hemispheric asymmetry for processing unpronounceable and pronounceable letter trigrams. Brain and Language, 46, 517-535.
6. Eviatar, Z. 1995. A cross-linguistic test of qualitative hemispheric differences in processing letter trigrams. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 1, 178.
7. Hayden, B. S., & Loud, L. 1969. Some norms for the pronounceability of nonsense syllables. Psychological Reports, 25, 415-418.
8. Hellige, J. B. 1993. Hemispheric asymmetry: What's right and what's left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
9. Hellige, J. B., Cowin, E. L., Eng, T., & Sergent, V. 1991. Perceptual reference frames and visual field asymmetry for verbal processing. Neuropsychologia, 29, 929-939.
10. Hellige, J. B., Taylor, A. K., & Eng, T. L. 1989. Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 711-722.
11. Levy, J., & Heller, W. 1987. Diversities in right-handers in left-hemisphere processing. In D. Ottoson (Ed.), Duality and unity of the brain. Hampshire, England: McMillan Press, Pp. 71-82.
12. Levy, J., Heller, W., Banich, M., & Burton, L. A. 1983. Are variations among right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 329-359.
13. Levy, J., & Reid, M. 1978. Variations in cerebral organization as a function of handedness, hand posture in writing, and sex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 119-144.
14. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Baynes, K. 1992. Modes of lexical access in the callosotomized brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 155-164.
15. Trope, I., Rozin, P., Nelson, D. K., & Gur, R. C. 1992. Information processing in the separated hemispheres of callosotomy patients: Does the analytic-holistic dichotomy hold? Brain and Cognition, 19, 123-147.
16. Young, A. W., & Ellis, A. W. 1985. Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields. Brain and Language, 24, 326-358.
17. Young, A. W., & Ellis, A. W. 1987. More things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in the initial letter acuity hypothesis. Brain and Language, 31, 364-371.