Generalized convexity preserving transformations

Computer Aided Geometric Design

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 179-197

  Carnicer, J M ^a   Garcia Esnaola M ^a   Pena J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Collocation matrix; Convexity; Shape preservation; Total positivity

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

BLENDING FUNCTIONS; COLLOCATION MATRIX; CONTROL POLYGON; CONVEXITY PRESERVING TRANSFORMATIONS; SHAPE PRESERVATION; TOTAL POSITIVITY;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY;

EID: 0030109609     PISSN: 01678396     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8396(95)00021-6     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Ando, T. (1987), Totally positive matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 90, 165-219.
2. Berens, H. and DeVore, R. (1980), A characterization of Bernstein polynomials, in: E.W. Cheney, ed., Approximation Theory III, Academic Press, Boston, MA.
3. Berman, A. and Plemmons, R.J. (1979), Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences, Academic Press, New York.
4. Carnicer, J.M. and Peña, J.M. (1993), Shape preserving representations and optimality of the Bernstein basis, Adv. Comput. Math. 1, 173-196.
5. Carnicer, J.M. and Peña, J.M. (1994a), Totally positive bases and optimality of B-splines, Computer Aided Geometric Design 11, 633-654.
6. Carnicer, J.M. and Peña, J.M. (1994b), Monotonicity preserving representations, in: P.J. Laurent, A. Le Méhauté and L.L. Schumaker, eds., Curves and Surfaces II, A.K. Peters, Wellesley, MA, 83-90.
7. Cheney, E.W. (1966), Introduction to Approximation Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
8. Gasca, M. and Peña, J.M. (1992), Total positivity and Neville elimination, Linear Algebra Appl. 165, 25-44.
9. Goodman, T.N.T. (1989), Shape preserving representations, in: T. Lyche and L.L. Schumaker, eds., Mathematical Methods in CAGD, Academic Press, Boston, MA, 333-357.
10. Karlin, S. (1968), Total Positivity, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.