Optimal survey design using focused resistivity arrays

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 358-366

  Cherkaeva, Elena ^a   Tripp, Alan C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC CURRENT DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRIC CURRENT DISTRIBUTION MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRODES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

APPLIED CURRENT INTENSITY DISTRIBUTION; FOCUSED RESISTIVITY ARRAYS; OPTIMAL CURRENT ARRAY; OPTIMAL SURVEY DESIGN; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

ELECTRIC PROSPECTING;

EID: 0030108752     PISSN: 01962892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/36.485113     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. H. G. Doll, Introduction to induction logging and application to logging of wells drilled with oil base mud, Petrol. Trans. AIME, vol. 186, pp. 148-162, 1949.
2. _, The Laterolog: A new resistivity logging method with electrodes using an automatic focusing system, Pelml. Trans. AIME, vol. 192, pp. 305-316, 1951.
3. _, Microlaterolog, Petrol. Trans. AIME, vol. 198, pp. 17-32, 1953.
4. P. D. Jackson, Focused electrical resistivity arrays: Some theoretical and practical experiments, Geuphys. Prospecting, vol. 99, pp. 601-626, 1981.
5. E. Brizzolary and M. Bernabini, Comparison between Schlumberger electrode arrangement and some focused electrode arrangements in resistivity profiles, Geophys. Prospecting, vol. 27, pp. 233-244, 1979.
6. D. H. Davies, O. Faivre, M.-T. Gounot, B. Seemati, J.-C. Trcuiiler, D. Benimeli, A. E. Ferreira, D. J. Pittman, J.-W. Smits, M. Randrianavony, B. I. Anderson, and J. Lovell, Azimuthal resistivity imaging: A new generation laterolog, SPE 24676, presented at the 67th SPE Annu. Conf., Washington, DC, 1992.
7. J. O. Parra and T. E. Owen, Synthetically focused resistivity for detecting deep targets, in Geaiec.hnic.al and Environmental Geophysics, S. H. Ward, Ed, vol. m. Tulsa, OK: SEG, 1990, pp. 37-50.
8. L. P. Beard and A. C. Tripp, Investigating the resolution of IP arrays using inverse theory, Geophysics, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1326-1341, 1995.
9. D. Isaacson, Distinguishability of conductivities by electric current computed tomography, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. MI-5, pp. 91-95, 1986.
10. D. G. Gisser, D. Isaacson, and J. C.'Newell, Theory and performance of an adaptive current tomography system, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., vol. 9, Suppl. A, pp. 35-41, 1988.
11. D. Isaacson and M. Cheney, Current problems in impedance imaging, in Inverse Problems 'in Partial Differential Equations, D. Colton, R. Ewing, and W. Rundell, Eds. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1990, pp. 141-149.
12. D. G. Gisser, D. Isaacson, and I. C. Newell, Electric current computed tomography and eigenvalues, SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 50, pp. 1623-1624, 1990.
13. E. Cherkaeva and A. C. Tripp, On the resolution of geoelectric imaging, submitted to SIAM J. Appl. Math.
14. J. J. Dongarra, J. R. Bunch, C. B. Moler, and G. W. Stewart, UNPACK User's Guide, SIAM, 1979.
15. C. W. Beasley and S. H. Ward, Three-dimensional mise-a-la-masse modeling applied to mapping fracture zones, Geophysics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 98-113, 1986.