An overall model for maintenance optimization

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 241-257

  Vatn, Jørn ^a   Hokstad, Per ^a   Bodsberg, Lars ^a  

^a SINTEF   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COSTS; DECISION THEORY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; PERSONNEL; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHEDULING;

MAINTENANCE COST; MAINTENANCE OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMAL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE; PRODUCTION LOSS;

MAINTENANCE;

EID: 0030105804     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00055-0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Nowland, F.S. & Heap, H.F., Reliability centered maintenance. DDC No. AD-A066579, Defense Documentation Center, Defense Logistics Agency, Alexandria, VA, USA, 1978.
2. Moubray, J., Reliability-Centred Maintenance, RCM II, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford, 1991.
3. Anderson, R.T. & Neri, L., Reliability-Centered Maintenance, Management and Engineering Methods, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, London, 1990.
4. Moss, M.A., Designing for Minimal Maintenance Expence, The Practical Application of Reliability and Maintainability, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1985.
5. Sandtorv, H. & Rausand, M., RCM - closing the loop between design reliability and operational reliability. Maintenance, 6 (1994) 13-21.
6. Dekker, R., Smit, A. & van Rijn, C. Mathematical models for the optimization of maintenance and their application in practice. Maintenance, 9 (1994) 22-26.
7. Sherwin, D., Future prospects for maintenance management and optimization. Presented at Maintenance '94: The Business of Maintenance in Europe, Gotenburg, Sweden, 7-11 March 1994.
8. de Groot, M. H., Optimal Statistical Decisions. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1970.
9. Keeney, R.L. & Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976.
10. The LIPS Committee for Utilization and Technical Evaluation, Laboratory Integration Prioritization System, LIPS. Draft Version 1.0, 1994.
11. IEC 50(191), Dependability and quality of service. In International Electrotechnical Vocabulary, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, 1990, p. 7.
12. Shachter, R.D., Evaluating influence diagrams. Operations Res., 34 (1986) 871-882.
13. Moosung, J.A.E. & Apostolakis, G.E., The use of influence diagrams for evaluating severe accident management strategies. Nucl. Tech., 99 (1992) 142-157.
14. Hong, Y. & Apostolakis, G.E., Conditional influence diagrams in risk management. Risk Analysis, 13 (1993) 625-636.
15. Blanchard, B. & Fabrycky, W., Systems Engineering and Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood cliffs, NJ, 1990.
16. Kaplan, S., Risk assessment and risk management -basic concepts and terminology. In Risk Management: Expanding Horizons in Nuclear Power and Other Industries, Hemisphere Publ. Corp., Boston, MA, 1991, pp.11-28.
17. Cooke, R., The analysis of competing failure modes. In Proc. PSAM-II, San Diego, USA, 20-25 March 1994.
18. Høyland, A. & Rausand, M., Reliability Theory, Models and Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1994.
19. Ascher, H. & Feingold, H., Repairable Systems Reliability. Modelling, Inference, Misconceptions and Their Causes, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1984.
20. Valdez-Flores, C. & Feldman, R.M., A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single-unit systems. Nav. Res. Log. Quart. 36 (1989) 419-446.
21. Block, H., Borges, W. & Savitz, T., Preventive maintenance policies. In Reliability and Quality Control, (Ed. A. P. Basu), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986, pp. 101-106.
22. Hokstad, P., Reliability modelling and the Martingale intensity process. In SRE-Symp. Reliability of Repairable Systems, SRE-93, Malmö, November 1993.
23. Taylor, H. M. & Karlin, S., An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling, Academic Press. NY, 1984 pp. 278-289.
24. Hokstad, P. & Frøvig, A.T., A model for degraded and critical failures for a component with periodic testing. Reliab. Engng System Safety, 51 (1996).
25. Bodsberg, L., VULCAN - a vulnerability calculation method for process safety systems. SINTEF Report STF75 A94051, Trondheim, Norway, 1994.
26. Phillips, D.T., Ravindran, A. & Solberg, J. Operations Research: Principles and Practice, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976.
27. Vatn, J., Optimizing replacements intervals under uncertainty. Submitted for publication, 1994.
28. Bodsberg, L., Comparative study of quantitative models for hardware, software and human reliability assessment. Quality & Reliab. Engng Int., 9 (1993) 501-518.
29. Bodsberg, L. & Hokstad, P., A system approach to reliability and life-cycle cost of process safety-systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 44 (1995).