End-user full-text searching: Access or excess?

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 133-149

  DiMartino, Diane ^a   Zoe, Lucinda R ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030099652     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90016-X     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adams Judith A., Bonk Sharon C. Electronic information technologies and resources: Use by university faculty and faculty preferences for related library sciences. College and Research Libraries. 56:1995;119-131.
2. Ankeny Melvon L. Evaluating end-user services: Success or satisfaction? Journal of Academic Librarianship. 16:1991;352-356.
3. Auster Ethel, Lawton Stephen B. Search interview techniques and information gains as antecedents of user satisfaction with online bibliographic retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 35:1984;90-103.
4. Azzaro Shannon, Cleary Kaye. Developing a computer-assisted learning package for end-users. CD-ROM Professional. 7:1994;95-96.
5. Barbuto Domenica M., Cevallos Eleana E. End-user searching: Program review and future prospects. RQ. 31:1991;214-227.
6. Baruch College, CUNY. Annual freshman survey, Fall 1992. 1992;24. Prepared by Shehbal Teilmann, Office of the Vice President for Student Development.
7. Blair David C., Maron M.E. Full-text information retrieval: Further analysis and clarification. Information Processing & Management. 26:1990;437-447.
8. DiMartino Diane, Ferns William J., Swacker Sharon. CD-ROM search techniques of novice end-users: Is the English-as-a-second languge student at a disadvantage? College & Research Libraries. 56:1995;49-59.
9. Green Herbert L. Technology to come will create major skill shifts: Workers must be ready. Nation's Cities Weekly. 17:1994;10.
10. Jacobson Thomas L., Fusani David. Computer, system and subject knowledge in novice searching of a full-text, multifile database. Library & Information Science Research. 14:1992;97-106.
11. Jacobson Thomas L. Sense-making in a database environment. Information Processing & Management. 27:1991;647-657.
12. Janke Richard V. Online searching after six: End-user searching comes of age. Online. 8:1984;15-29.
13. Lancaster F.W., Elzy Cheryl, Zeter Mary Jo, Metzler Laura, Low Yuen-Man. Searching databases on CD-ROM: Comparison of the results of end-user searching with results from two modes of searching by skilled intermediaries. RQ. 33:1994;370-386.
14. LePoer Peter M., Mularski Carol A. CD-ROMs' impact on libraries and users. Laserdisk Professional. 2:1989;39-45.
15. Nash Stan, Wilson Myong Chung. Value-added bibliographic instruction: Teaching students to find the right citations. Reference Services Review. 19:1991;87-92.
16. Sandore Beth. Online searching: What measure satisfaction? Library & Information Science Research. 12:1990;33-54.
17. Sievert Mary Ellen, McKinnin Emma J. Why full-text misses some relevant documents: An Analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS. Katzer Jeffrey, B. Newby Gregory. Proceedings of the 52nd American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting. 1989;34-39 Learned Information, Medford, NJ.
18. Su Louise. An Investigation to find appropriate measures for evaluating interactive information retrieval. Katzer Jeffrey, Newby Gregory B. Proceedings of the 52nd American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting. 1989;13-23 Learned Information, Medford, NJ.
19. Tenopir Carol, Burglund Sharon. Full-text searching on major supermarket systems: Dialog, Data-star, and Nexis. Database. 16:1993;32-42.
20. Trzebiatowski Elaine. End user study on BRS/after Dark. RQ. 23:1984;446-450.
21. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of education statistics 1994. 1994;Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.