Challenging the myths surrounding qualitative research in nursing

Nursing Science Quarterly

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 33-37

  Bunkers, Sandra Schmidt ^a  

^a AUGUSTANA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Myths; Nursing Science; Philosophy of Science; Qualitative Research

Indexed keywords

HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSE; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; NURSES; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHY, NURSING; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 0030098995     PISSN: 08943184     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089431849600900109     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Burns, N. (1989). Standards for qualitative research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 2, 44-52.
2. Chenitz, W.C., Swanson, J.M. (1986). From practice to grounded theory: Qualitative research in nursing. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Cody, W. (1994). The language of nursing science: If not now, when? Nursing Science Quarterly, 7, 98-99.
4. Cody, W. (1995). Of life immense in passion, pulse, and power: Dialoguing with Whitman and Parse - a hermeneutic study. In R.R. Parse (Ed), Illuminations: The human becoming theory in practice and research (pp. 269-307). New York: National League for Nursing Press.