Advocacy for routine obstetric ultrasound an essential obligation in contemporary obstetric care

ACOG Clinical Review

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 1-4

  Chervenak, Frank A ^a   McCullough, Laurence B ^a   Ledger, William J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030098897     PISSN: 10856862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1085-6862(00)80001-1     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. 1. Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, LeFevre ML, Bain RP, McNellis D. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:821-7.
2. 2. Romero R. Routine obstetric ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993;3: 303-7.
3. 3. Skupski DW, Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Is routine screening for all patients? Clin Perinatol 1994;21:707-22.
4. 4. McCullough LB, Chervenak FC. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1994.
5. 5. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Chervenak JL. Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: an indication for obstetric ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:857-60.
6. 6. Ewigman BG, Le Fevre M, Bain RP, Crane JP, Frigoletto R, Cramer D, McNellis D. Ethics and routine ultrasonography in pregnancy [Letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:256-7.
7. 7. Devore G. The routine antenatal diagnostic imaging with ultrasound study: another perspective. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:622-6.
8. 8. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DS. Extreme risk - the new corporate proposition for physicians. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1706-8.