The Factor Structure of the Perception of Birth Scale

Nursing Research

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 83-86

  Fawcett, Jacqueline ^a   Knauth, Donna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; DELIVERY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR; METHODOLOGY; MOTHER; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; MOTHERS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0030094910     PISSN: 00296562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-199603000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ANASTASI, A. (1976). Psychological testing (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
2. ANDERSON, A. B., BASILEVSKY, A., & HUM, D. P. J. (1983). Missing data: A review of the literature. In P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 415-494). New York: Academic Press.
3. COHEN, J., & COHEN, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlhaum.
4. CRANLEY, M. S., HEDAHL, K. J., & PEGG, S. H. (1983). Women's perceptions of vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Nursing Research, 32, 10-15.
5. FAWCETT, J. (1991). Effects of adaptation to cesarean birth. Final report of a project supported by the National Center for Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Grant Number R01-NR01694. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.
6. FAWCETT, J., POLLIO, N., TULLY, A., BARON, M., HENKLEIN, J. C. & JONES, R. C. (1993). Effects of information on adaptation to cesarean birth. Nursing Research, 42, 49-53.
7. KERLINGER, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
8. KIM, J., & MUELLER, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9. KOTTKAMP, V. (1986, March). Expectations and perceptions of childbearing events. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Miami Beach, FL.
10. MARUT, J. S. (1978). The special needs of the cesarean mother. MCN/American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 3, 202-206.
11. MARUT, J. S., & MERCER, R. T. (1979). Comparison of primiparas' perceptions of vaginal and cesarean births. Nursing Research, 28, 260-266.
12. MERCER, R. T., HACKLEY, K. C., & BOSTROM, A. G. (1983). Relationship of psychosocial and perinatal variables to perception of childbirth. Nursing Research, 32, 202-207.
13. NUNNALLY, J. C., & BERNSTEIN, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. ROY, C., & ANDREWS, H. A. (1991). The Roy Adaptation Model: The definitive statement. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange.
15. SAMKO, M. R., & SCHOENFELD, L. S. (1975). Hypnotic susceptibility and the Lamaze childbirth experience. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecohgy, 121, 631-636.
16. STEVENS, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.