Spatiotemporal adaptation model for retinal ganglion cells

Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 419-435

  Dahari, Ronen ^a   Spitzer, Hedva ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; TIME;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0030094522     PISSN: 10847529     EISSN: 15208532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.13.000419     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. B. Sakmann and O. D. Creutzfeldt, “Scotopic and mesopic light adaptation in the cat’s retina,” Plugers Arch. 313, 168–185 (1969).
2. H. B. Barlow and W. R. Levick, “Changes in the maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina,” J. Physiol. 202, 699–718 (1969).
3. R. M. Shapley and C. Enroth-Cugell, “Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls,” Prog. Ret. Res. 3, 263–346 (1984).
4. C. Enroth-Cugell and R. M. Shapley, “Adaptation and dynamics of cat retinal ganglion cells,” J. Physiol. 233, 271–309 (1973).
5. H. B. Barlow and W. R. Levick, “Threshold setting by the surround of cat retinal ganglion,” J. Physiol. 259, 737–757 (1976).
6. M. Yoon, “Influence of adaptation level on response pattern and sensitivity of ganglion cells in the cat’s retina,” J. Physiol. 221, 93–104 (1972).
7. C. Enroth-Cugell and P. Lennie, “The control of retinal ganglion cell discharge by receptive field surrounds,” J. Physiol. 247, 551–578 (1975).
8. C. Enroth-Cugell, P. Lennie, and R. M. Shapley, “Surround contribution to light adaptation in cat retinal ganglion cells,” J. Physiol. 247, 579–588 (1975).
9. G. Cleland and C. Enroth-Cugell, “Quantitative aspects of gain and latency in the cat retina,” J. Physiol. 206, 73–91 (1968).
10. N. A. M. Schellart and H. Spekreijse, “Dynamic characteristics of retinal ganglion cell responses in goldfish,” J. Gen. Physiol. 59, 1–21 (1972).
11. L. Maffei, “Inhibitory and facilitory spatial interactions in retinal receptive fields,” Vision Res. 8, 1187–1194 (1968).
12. H.-A. Saito and Y. Fukada, “Gain control mechanisms within the receptive field center of cat’s retinal ganglion cells,” Vision Res. 15, 1407–1410 (1975).
13. R. Rodieck, “Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli,” Vision Res. 5, 583–601 (1965).
14. J. G. Robson, “Receptive fields: neural representation of the spatial and intensive attributes of the visual image,” in Seeing, Handbook of Perception, E. C. Carterette and M. S. Friedman, eds. (Academic, New York, 1975), Vol. 5, pp. 81–116.
15. J. Richter and S. A. Ullman, “A model for the temporal organization of X- and Y-type receptive fields in the primate retina,” Biol. Cybernet. 43, 127–145 (1982).
16. M. G. F. Fuortes and A. L. Hodgkin. “Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia of limulus,” J. Physiol. 172, 239–263 (1964).
17. G. Sperling and M. Sondhi, “Model for visual luminance discrimination and flicker detection,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 1133–1145 (1968).
18. D. A. Baylor and A. L. Hodgkin, “Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors,” J. Physiol. 242, 729–758 (1974).
19. D. A. Baylor, A. L. Hodgkin, and T. D. Lamb, “Reconstruction of the electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light,” J. Physiol. 242, 759–791 (1974).
20. W. S. Geisler, “Effects of bleaching and backgrounds on the flash response of the cone system,” J. Physiol. 312,413-434 (1981).
21. K. Purpura, D. Tranchina, E. Kaplan, and R. M. Shap- ley, “Light adaptation in the primate retina: analysis of changes in gain and dynamics of monkey retinal ganglion cells,” Vis. Neurosci. 4, 75–93 (1990).
22. R. A. Normann and I. Perlman, “Evaluating sensitivity changing mechanisms in light-adapted photoreceptors,” Vision Res. 19, 391–394 (1979).
23. R. M. Boynoton and D. N. Whitten, “Visual adaptation in monkey cones: recording of late receptor potentials,” Science 170, 1423–1426 (1970).
24. F. S. Werblin and D. R. Copenhagen, “Control of retinal sensitivity. III. Lateral interactions at the inner plexiform layer,” J. Gen. Physiol. 63, 88–110 (1974).
25. M. Dawis and R. L. Purple, “Adaptation in cones: a general model,” Biophys. J. 39, 151–155 (1982).
26. E. H. Adelson, “Saturation and adaptation in the rod system,” Vision Res. 22, 1299–1312 (1982).
27. J. M. Valeton and D. Van Norren, “Light adaptation of primate cones: an analysis based on extracellular data,” Vision Res. 23, 1539–1547 (1983).
28. M. M. Hayhoe, N. I. Benimoff, and D. C. Hood, “The time- course of multiplicative and subtractive adaptation process,” Vision Res. 27, 1981–1996 (1987).
29. H. Spitzer, M. Almon, and V. M. Sandler, “A model for detection of spatial and temporal edges by a single X cell,” Vision Res. 33, 1871–1880 (1993).
30. H. Spitzer, M. Almon, and I. Sherman, “A model for the early stages of motion processing based on spatial and temporal edge detection by X-cells,” Spatial Vision 8, 341–368 (1994).
31. A. B. Watson and J. Nachmias, “Patterns of temporal interaction in the detection of gratings,” Vision Res. 17,893-902 (1977).
32. G. Sperling, “Model of visual adaptation and contrast detection,” Percept. Psychophys. 8, 143–157 (1970).
33. G. Carpenter and S. Grossberg, “Adaptaton and transmitter gating in vertebrate photoreceptors,” J. Theoret. Neurobiol. 1, 1–42 (1981).
34. N. Graham and D. C. Hood, “Modeling the dynamics of light adaptation: the merging of two traditions,” Vision Res. 32, 1373–1393 (1992).
35. J. D. Victor, “The dynamics of the cat retinal X cell center,” J. Physiol. 386, 219–246 (1987).
36. M. A. Finkelstein, M. Harrison, and D. C. Hood, “Sites of sensitivity control within a long-wavelength cone pathway,” Vision Res. 30, 1145–1158 (1990).
37. D. C. Hood and M. A. Finkelstein, “Visual sensitivity,” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, K. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. Thomas, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1986), Vol. 1, pp. 5–1-5-66.
38. J. Stone and M. Fabian, “Summing properties of the cat’s retinal ganglion cell,” Vision Res. 8, 1023–1040 (1968).
39. E. Kaplan, S. Marcus, and Y. T. So, “Effects of dark adaptation on spatial and temporal properties of receptive fields in cat lateral geniculate nucleus,” J. Physiol. 294, 561–580 (1979).
40. B. Barlow, R. Fitzhugh, and S. W. Kuffler, “Changes of organization in the receptive fields of the cat’s retina during dark adaptation,” J. Physiol. 137, 338–354 (1957).
41. L. Tong and D. G. Green, “Adaptation pools and excitation receptive fields of rat retinal ganglion cells,” Vision Res. 17, 1233–1236 (1977).
42. C. Enroth-Cugell and L. H. Pinto, “Pure central responses from off-centre cells and pure surround responses from on- centre cells,” J. Physiol. 220, 441–464 (1972).
43. S. J. Daly and R. A. Normann, “Temporal information processing in cones: effects of light adaptation on temporal summation and modulation,” Vision Res. 25, 1197–1206 (1985).
44. J. Walraven, C. Enroth-Cugell, D. C. Hood, D. I. A. Macleod, and J. L. Schnapf, “The control of visual sensitivity: re- ceptoral and postreceptoral processes,” in Visual Perception, the Neurophysiological Foundations, L. Spillman and J. S. Werner, eds. (Academic, New York, 1990), pp. 53–101.
45. S. Grossberg, “Neural pattern discrimination,” J. Theoret. Neurobiol. 27, 291–337 (1970).
46. S. Grossberg, “Thew quantized geometry of visual space: the coherent computation of depth, form, and lightness,” Behav. Brain Sci. 6, 625–692 (1983).
47. C. Enroth-Cugell and R. M. Shapley, “Flux, not retinal illumination, is what retinal ganglion cells really care about,” J. Physiol. 233, 311–326 (1973).
48. P. Gaudiano, “Simulations of X and Y retinal ganglion cell behavior with a nonlinear push-pull model of spatiotemporal retinal processing,” Vision Res. 34, 1767–1784 (1994).
49. B. Sakmann and M. Filion, “Light adaptation of the late receptor potential in the cat retina,” In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Plenum, New York, 1972), Vol. 24, pp. 87–93.
50. D. A. Baylor, M. G. F. Fuortes, and P. M. O’Bryan, “Receptive fields of cones in the retina of the turtle,” J. Physiol. 214, 265–294 (1971).
51. L. Maffei, A. Fiorentini, and L. Cervetto, “Homeostasis in retinal receptive fields,” J. Neurophysiol. 34, 579–587 (1971).
52. R. A. Normann and I. Perlman, “The effects of background illumination on the photoresponses of red and green cones,” J. Physiol. 286, 491–507 (1979).