Integration of Orthographic, Conceptual, and Episodic Information on Implicit and Explicit Tests

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 72-85

  Weldon, Mary Susan ^a   Massaro, Dominic W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; FUZZY LOGIC; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECALL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; FUZZY LOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PROBLEM SOLVING; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 0030094393     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1196-1961.50.1.72     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Basden, B.H., Basden, D.R., Church, B.A., & Beaupre, P. (1991). Setting boundary conditions on the part-set cuing effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 213-216.
2. Blaxton, T.A. (1992). Dissociations among memory measures in memory-impaired subjects: Evidence for a processing account of memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 549-562.
3. Bruce, D. (1980). Single probes, double probes, and the structure of memory traces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 276-292.
4. Challis, B.H., & Brodbeck, D.R. (1992). Level of processing affects priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 595-607.
5. Chandler, J.P. (1969). Subroutine STEPIT - Finds local minima of a smooth function of several parameters. Behavioral Science, 14, 81-82.
6. Gibson, J.M., & Watkins, M.J. (1987). A pool of 1086 words with unique two-letter fragments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 390-397.
7. Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 553-568.
8. Graf, P., & Ryan, L. (1991). Transfer-appropriate processing for implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 978-992.
9. Jacoby, L.L., & Hollingshead, A. (1990). Toward a generate/recognize model of performance on direct and indirect tests of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 433-454.
10. Jones, G.V. (1976). A fragmentation hypothesis of memory: Cued recall of pictures and of sequential position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 277-293.
11. Massaro, D.W. (1987a). Integrating multiple sources of information in listening and reading. In D.A. Allport, D.G. MacKay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.), Language perception and production: Shared mechanisms in listening, speaking, reading and writing (pp. 111-129). London: Academic Press.
12. Massaro, D.W. (1987b). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Massaro, D.W. (1990). The psychology of connectionism. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 13, 403-406.
14. Massaro, D.W., & Friedman, D. (1990). Models of integration given multiple sources of information. Psychological Review, 97, 225-252.
15. Massaro, D.W., Weldon, M.S., & Kitzis, S.N. (1991). Integration of orthographic and semantic information in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 277-287.
16. Nelson, D.L., McEvoy, C.L., & Friedrich, M.A. (1982). Extralist cuing and retrieval inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8, 89-105.
17. Rappold, V.A., & Hashtroudi, S. (1991). Does organization improve priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 103-114.
18. Roediger, H.L., III. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
19. Roediger, H.L., III, & Neely, J.H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 213-242.
20. Roediger, H.L., III, Weldon, M.S., & Challis, B.A. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H.L. Roediger, III & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honor of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Rubin, D.C., & Wallace, W.T. (1989). Rhyme and reason: Analyses of dual retrieval cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 698-709.
22. Schacter, D.L., Bowers, J., & Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J.C. Dunn & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Slamecka, N.J. (1969). Testing for associative strength in multitrial free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 557-560.
24. Squire, L.S. (1994). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. In D.L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory Systems 1994 (pp. 204-231). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D.L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-306.
26. Tulving, E., & Watkins, M.J. (1973). Continuity between recall and recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 739-748.
27. Weldon, M.S., & Colston, H.L. (in press). Dissociating the generation stage in implicit and explicit memory tests: Incidental production can differ from strategic access. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
28. Weldon, M.S., & Coyote, K.C. (in press). The failure to find the picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
29. Weldon, M.S., & Roediger, H.L, III. (1987) Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 21, 519-528.
30. Weldon, M.S., Roediger, H.L., III, Beitel, D.A., & Johnston, T.R. (1995). Perceptual and conceptual processes in implicit and explicit tests with picture fragment and word fragment cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 268-285.
31. Weldon, M.S., Roediger, H.L., III, & Challis, B.H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 95-105.
32. Wenger, M.J., & Payne, D.G. (1995). Cue integration across encoding and retrieval conditions: Implications for the study of retrieval processes. Manuscript submitted for publication.