Critical Care Graduate Diploma: nursing students' needs identified in evaluation

Australian Critical Care

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 10-13

  Chaboyer, Wendy ^a   Retsas, Andrew ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CRITICAL CARE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 0030093607     PISSN: 10367314     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1036-7314(96)70304-1     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Scriven M. The methodology of evaluation. In: Worthen B.R., and Sanders J.R. (Eds). Educational evaluation: theory and practice (1973), CA Jones, Worthington OH 60-104
2. Brookfield S.D. Understanding and facilitating adult learning (1986), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
3. Guba E.G., and Lincoln Y.S. Effective evaluation: improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches (1991), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
4. Guba E.G., and Lincoln Y.S. Fourth generation evaluation (1989), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
5. Stake RE. Evaluating educational programmes: the need and the response. Paris, France: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD), 1971
6. Australian Critical Care. Press release: specialist nurse education - present and future. Australian Critical Care 1994; 7:1, 15