|
Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 637-673
|
The maternal-fetal rights dilemma: honoring a woman's choice of medical care during pregnancy.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CIVIL RIGHTS;
FEMALE;
FETUS;
FETUS DISEASE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HUMAN;
IN RE MADYUN;
JEFFERSON V. GRIFFIN SPALDING CO. HOSPITAL AUTHORITY;
JEHOVAH'S WITNESS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
JUVENILE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MORALITY;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY COMPLICATION;
PREGNANT WOMAN;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
REVIEW;
ROE V. WADE;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
IN RE MADYUN;
JEFFERSON V. GRIFFIN SPALDING CO. HOSPITAL AUTHORITY;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
ROE V. WADE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
FEMALE;
FETAL DISEASES;
FETUS;
HUMANS;
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
MINORS;
MORALS;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
VALUE OF LIFE;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
|
EID: 0030093566
PISSN: 08821046
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (255)
|