Monitoring drug use using Bayesian acceptance sampling: The Illinois experiment

Operations Research

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 274-285

  Lattimore, Pamela K ^a   Baker, Joanna R ^b   Matheson, Lance A ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE   (United States)

^b JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DRUG PRODUCTS; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; QUALITY CONTROL; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BAYESIAN ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING; INTENSIVE DRUG SUPERVISION PROGRAM;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0030092485     PISSN: 0030364X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/opre.44.2.274     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AMERICAN PROBATION AND PAROLE ASSOCIATION. 1991. American Probation and Parole Association's Drug Testing Guidelines for Adult Probation and Parole Agencies. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, D.C.
2. AXEL, H. 1990. Corporate Experience With Drug Testing Programs. Conference Board Report No. 941, The Conference Board, Inc., New York.
3. BAKER, J. R., P. K. LATTIMORE AND L. A. MATHESON. 1993. Constructing Optimal Drug-Testing Plans Using a Bayesian Acceptance Sampling Model. Math, and Comp. Model. 17, 77-88.
4. CAPLEN, R. H. 1962. A Contribution to the Problem of Choosing a Sampling Inspection Plan. Quality Eng. 26, 103-107.
5. CARVER, J. A. 1986. Drugs and Crime: Controlling Use and Reducing Risk Through Testing. National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.
6. CHASE, R. B., AND N. J. AQUILANO. 1992. Production and Operations Management A Life Cycle Approach, 6th Edition. Illinois, Richard D. Irwin.
7. COLLINS, J. J. 1989. Policy Choices in Urine Testing of Probationers and Parolees. Presentation to the American Society of Criminology, Reno, Nevada.
8. DUNCAN, A. J. 1974. Quality Control and Industrial Statistics, 4th Edition. Richard D. Irwin, Illinois.
9. EVANS, G. W., AND S. M. ALEXANDER. 1987. Multiobjective Decision Analysis for Acceptance Sampling Plans. IEE Trans. 19, 308-316.
10. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, OFFICE OF . NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY. 1991. ONDCP Bulletin No. 3, August.
11. HEEREMANS, J. H. 1962. Determination of Optimal In-Process Inspection Plans. Ind. Qual. Control 19, 22-37.
12. HUBBARD, R. L., M. E. MARSDEN, J. V. RACHAL, H. J. HARWOOD, E. R. CAVANAUGH AND H. M. GINZBURG. 1989. Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, N.C.
13. KENNEDY, E. 1993. The Effects of Partial Drug Testing on Drug-Use Behavior and Self-Disclosure Validity. Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, Chicago.
14. LATESSA, E. J. 1991. The Effects of Random Drug Testing on Probationers. Presentation to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Nashville, Tenn.
15. LATTIMORE, P. K., J. R. BAKER, E. KENNEDY AND L. A. MATHESON. 1995. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Acceptance Sampling Approach to Drug Testing. Final Report. National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.
16. MOSKOWITZ, H., R. PLANTE AND K. TANG. 1986. Multistage Multiattribute Acceptance Sampling in Serial Production Systems. IEE Trans. 16, 130-137.
17. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE. 1990. Technical, Scientific and Procedural Issues of Employee Drug Testing. Consensus Report, Washington, D.C.
18. RICE, D. P., S. KELMAN, L. S. MILLER, AND S. DUNMEYER. 1990. The Economic Costs of Alcohol and Drug Abuse and Mental Illness: 1985. Report Submitted to the Office of Financing and Coverage Policy of the Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco.
19. TANG, K., R. PLANTE AND H. MOSKOWITZ. 1986. Multiattribute Bayesian Acceptance Sampling Plans Under Nondestructive Sampling. Mgmt. Sci. 32, 739-750.
20. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE. 1991. Comprehensive Procedures for Drug Testing in the Workplace: A Process Model of Planning, Implementation, and Action. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.
21. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS. 1992. A National Report: Drugs, Crime and the Justice System. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
22. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE. 1993. Fourth Quarter 1992 Drug Use Forecasting Quarterly Report, July 1993. National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.
23. VISHER, C. A. 1991. A Comparison of Urinalysis Technologies for Drug Testing in Criminal Justice. Research Report-132397, November, National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.
24. VISHER, C. A., AND K. McFADDEN. 1991. A Comparison of Urinalysis Technologies for Drug Testing in Criminal Justice. National Institute of Justice (Research in Action, June), Washington, D.C. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. April 2, 1992. More US Companies Test Employees for Drug Use.
25. THE WHITE HOUSE. 1992. National Drug Control Strategy: A Nation Responds to Drug Use. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
26. WISH, E. D., AND B. A. GROPPER. 1990. Drug Testing by the Criminal Justice System: Methods, Research, and Applications. In Crime and Justice, 13, Drugs and Crime, 321-391. The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.