Ultimate tensile strength of five interchangeable prosthetic retaining screws

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 16-19

  Jaarda, Merle J ^a   Razzoog, Michael E ^a   Gratton, David G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOLD ALLOY; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; GOLD ALLOYS; MATERIALS TESTING; TENSILE STRENGTH; TITANIUM;

EID: 0030089626     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199600510-00003     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. JOMI Current Issues Forum. What scientific proof does the restorative clinician have that intersystem implant hardware components are interchangeable without potential harm to long-term implant survival? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:105-109.
2. Henry PJ. Implant hardware - science or commodity development? J Dent Res. 1995;74:301-302.
3. Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Comparison of "look-alike" implant prosthetic retaining screws. J Prosthodont. 1995;4:23-27.
4. Schulte JK. External hex manufacturing tolerances of six implant systems: a pilot study. Implant Dent. 1994;3: 51-53.
5. The role of screws in implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9(suppl):48-63.
6. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:185-194.
7. Burguete RL, Johns RB, King T, et al. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:592-599.