Load distribution on implants with a cantilevered superstructure: An in vitro pilot study

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 36-42

  Wang, Shaoan ^a,c   Hobkirk, John A ^b  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; PILOT STUDY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 0030089433     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199600510-00008     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Beumer J III, Hamada MO, Lewis S. A prosthodontic overview. Int J Prosthodont. 1993;6:126-130.
2. Minsley GE, Koth DL. Practical implant prosthodontics. In: McKinney RV Jr, ed. Endosteal Dental Implants. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1991:375-387.
3. Albrektsson T, Jansson T, Lekholm U. Osseointegrated dental implants. Dent Clin North Am. 1986;30:151-174.
4. Lemons JE, Bidez MW. Endosteal implant biomaterials and biomechanics. In: McKinney RV Jr, ed. Endosteal Dental Implants. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1991: 27-36.
5. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:843-848.
6. Skalak R. Aspects of biomechanical considerations. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1985:117-128.
7. Davis DM, Zarb GA, Chao Y-L. Studies on frameworks for osseointegrated prostheses: part 1. The effect of varying the number of supporting abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:197-201.
8. Rangert B, Gunne J, Sullivan DY. Mechanical aspects of a Brånemark implant connected to a natural tooth: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:177-186.
9. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jörneus L. Forces and moments on Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989; 4:241-247.
10. Brunski JB, Skalak R. Biomechanics of osseointegration and dental prostheses. In: Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Worthington P, eds. Osseointegration in Oral Rehabilitation: An Introductory Textbook. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1993:133-156.
11. Glantz P-O. Aspects of prosthodontic design. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1985:329-331.
12. Fenton AH, Zarb GA. Research status of prosthodontic procedures. Int J Prosthodont. 1993;6:137-144.
13. McCartney JW. Cantilever rests: an alternative to the unsupported distal cantilever of osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses for the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:817-819.