|
Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 95-112
|
Subject only to the attitude of the surgeon concerned : The judicial protection of medical discretion
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ABORTION ACT 1967 (GREAT BRITAIN);
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE;
EMOTION;
FEMALE;
FREEDOM;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH SERVICE;
HUMAN;
INDUCED ABORTION;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LAW;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
PATERNALISM;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMAN;
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;
R. V. BOURNE;
R. V. SMITH;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
ABORTION ACT 1967 (GREAT BRITAIN);
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
R. V. BOURNE;
R. V. SMITH;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
ATTITUDE;
EMOTIONS;
FEMALE;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGISLATION;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
PATERNALISM;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIANS;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL;
WOMEN;
WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
|
EID: 0030088423
PISSN: 09646639
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/096466399600500106 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (33)
|