Recent advances in tissue synthesis in vivo by use of collagen-glycosaminoglycan copolymers

Biomaterials

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 291-299

  Ellis, D L ^a   Yannas, I V ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Collagen; ECM analogue; Glycosaminoglycans; Nerve regeneration; Skin regeneration; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

BIOSYNTHESIS; CELLS; COLLAGEN; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); LIGHT SCATTERING; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; TISSUE;

BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GLYCOAMINOGLYCAN COPOLYMERS; GUINEA PIGS; IN VIVO TISSUE SYNTHESIS; LASER LIGHT SCATTERING; NERVE REGENERATION; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES; SKIN REGENERATION; WOUND HEALING;

GRAFT COPOLYMERS;

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; COPOLYMER; GLYCOSAMINOGLYCAN;

ARTICLE; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GUINEA PIG; LIGHT SCATTERING; NERVE REGENERATION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIATIC NERVE; SKIN; TISSUE REGENERATION; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0030088010     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85567-0     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Yannas IV, Burke JF, Design of an artificial skin. I. Design principles. J Biomed Mater Res 1980; 14: 65-68.
2. Yannas IV, Burke JF, Gordon PL, Huang C, Rubinstein RH. Design of an artificial skin. II. Control of chemical composition. J Biomed Mater Res 1980; 14: 107-131.
3. Dagalakis N, Flink J, Stasikelis P, Burke JF, Yannas IV. Design of an artificial skin. III. Control of pore structure. J Biomed Mater Res 1980; 14: 511-528.
4. Yannas IV. Use of artificial skin in wound management. In: Dineen P, ed. The Surgical Wound. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1981: 171-190.
5. Yannas IV, Burke JF, Orgill DP, Skrabut EM. Wound tissue can utilize a polymeric template to synthesize a functional extension of skin. Science 1982; 215: 174-176.
6. Yannas IV, Orgill DP, Skrabut EM, Burke JF. Skin regeneration with a bioreplaceable polymeric template. In: Gebelein GG, ed. Polymeric Materials and Artificial Organs. Washington: American Chemical Society, 1984: 191-197.
7. Murphy GF, Orgill DP, Hancock WW, Fonferko EB, Yannas IV. Morphological reconstitution of skin by use of a biodegradable polymeric graft. Lab Invest 1986; 54: 45A.
8. Yannas IV, Lee E, Skrabut EM, Orgill DP, Murphy GF. Characterization of a polymeric matrix for regeneration of skin. J Cell Biol 1987; 105: 223a.
9. Yannas IV. Regeneration of skin and nerve by use of collagen templates. In: Nimni ME, ed. Collagen (Vol. III. Biotechnology). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1988: 87-115.
10. Yannas IV. Skin, regeneration templates. Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering (2nd edn, Vol. 15). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1989: 317-334.
11. Yannas IV, Lee E, Orgill DP, Skrabut EM, Murphy GF. Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86: 933-937.
12. Yannas IV. Biologically active analogs of the extracellular matrix. Angewandte Chemie 1990; 29: 20-35.
13. Yannas IV. Biologically active analogs of the extracellular matrix. In: Williams DF, ed. Materials Science And Technology, A Comprehensive Treatment Medical and Dental Materials (Vol. 14). Germany: VCH Weinheim, 1991; 180-208.
14. Murphy, GF, Orgill DP, Yannas IV. Partial dermal regeneration is induced by biodegradable collagen-glycosaminoglycan grafts. Lab Invest 1990; 63: 305.
15. Ring W, Mita I, Jenkins AD, Bikales NM. Pure Appl Chem 1985; 57: 1427.
16. Yannas IV, Burke JF, Huang C, Gordon PL. Suppression of in vivo degradability and of immunogenicity of collagen by reaction with glycosaminoglycans. Polym Prepr Am Chem Soc Div Polym Chem 1975; 16(2): 209-214.
17. Roels H. In: Glynn LE, ed. Tissue Repair and Regeneration. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, 1981: 265-270.
18. Peacock EE Jr, Schwartz SI, Shires GT, Spencer FC, Storer EH, eds. Principles of Surgery (4th edn.) New York. McGraw-Hill Inc., 1984: 289.
19. Billingham RE, Medawar PB. The technique of free skin grafting in mammals. J Exper Biol 1951; 28: 385-394.
20. Billingham RE, Medawar PB. Contracture and intussusceptive growth in the healing of extensive wounds in mammalian skin. J Anat 1955; 89: 114-123.
21. Lundborg G, Dahlin LB, Danielsen N et al. Nerve regeneration in silicone chambers: influence of gap length and of distal stump components. Exper Neurol 1982; 76: 361.
22. Lundborg G. Nerve regeneration and repair: a review. Acta Orthop Scand 1987; 58: 145-169.
23. Yannas IV, Orgill DP, Silver J, Norregaard T, Zervas NT, Schoene WC. Polymeric template facilitates regeneration of sciatic nerve across 15-mm gap. Trans Soc Biomater 1985; 8: 146.
24. Yannas IV, Krarup C, Chang A, Norregaard TV, Zervas NT, Sethi R. Conduction properties of nerve fibers regenerated across gap bridged by biodegradable polymer matrix. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1987; 13: 1043.
25. Yannas IV, Orgill DP, Silver J, Norregaard TV, Zervas NT, Schoene WC. Regeneration of sciatic nerve across 15 mm gap by use of a polymeric template. In: Gebelein GG, ed. Advances in Biomedical Polymers. New York: Plenum Press, 1987: 1-9.
26. Chang AS, Yannas IV. Peripheral nerve regeneration. Neuroscience Year (Supplement 2 to the Encyclopedia of Neuroscience). Boston: Birkhauser, 1992: 125-126.
27. Chang AS, Yannas IV, Perutz S et al. Electrophysiological study of recovery of peripheral nerves regenerated by a collagen-glycosaminoglycan copolymer matrix. Progress in Biomedical Polymers. New York: Plenum Press, 1990: 107-120.
28. Beumer GJ, van Blitterswijk CA, Bakker D, Ponec M. Cell seeding and in vitro biocompatibility evaluation of polymeric matrices of PEO/PBT copolymers and PLLA. Biomaterials 1993; 14(8): 598.
29. Beumer GJ, van Blitterswijk CA, Ponec M. Biocompatibility of a biodegradable matrix used as a skin substitute: an in vivo evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res 1994; 28(5): 545.
30. Kaiser HW, Stark GB, Kopp J, Balcerkiewicz A, Spiker G, Kreysel HW. Cultured autologous keratinocytes in fibrin glue suspension, exclusively and combined with STS-allograft (preliminary clinical and histological report of a new technique). Burns 1994; 20(1): 23.
31. Dejardin C, Vanderkelen A, Vanwijk R. Enhancement of healing of mesh grafts with autologous keratinocytes. Acta Chir Belg 1994; 94(2): 113.
32. Hanthamrongwit M, Grant MH, Wilkinson R. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) for the study of collagen sponge microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res 1994; 28(2): 213.
33. Lasa CI Jr, Kidd RR III, Nunez HA, Drohan WN. Effect of fibrin glue and opsite on open wounds in DB/DB mice. J Surg Res 1993; 54(3): 202.
34. Cooper ML, Andree C, Hansbrough JF, Zapata-Sirvent RL, Spielvogel RL. Direct comparison of a cultured composite skin substitute containing human keratinocytes and fibroblasts to an epidermal sheet graft containing human keratinocytes on athymic mice. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 101(6): 81.
35. Cooper ML, Spielvogel RL. Artificial skin for wound healing. Clin Dermatol 1994; 12(1): 183-191.
36. Phillips TJ. Biologic skin substitutes. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1993; 19(8): 794.
37. Boyce ST, Medrano EE, Abdel-Malek Z, Supp AP, Dodick JM. Pigmentation and inhibition of wound contraction by cultured skin substitutes with adult melanocytes after transplantation to athymic mice. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 100(4): 360.
38. Cairns B, deSerres S, Peterson HD, Meyer AA. Skin replacements. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 1246-1252.
39. Krejci NC, McGuire J. Treatment of burns with skin substitutes. J Dermatol Sci 1992; 4(3): 149-155.
40. Nanchahal J, Ward CM. New grafts for old? A review of alternatives to autologous skin. Br J Plast Surg 1992; 45(5): 354.
41. Terris DJ. Current issues in nerve repair. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119(7): 725-731.
42. Wong BJ, Mattox DE. Experimental nerve regeneration. A review. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1991; 24(3): 739-752.
43. Shafritz TA, Rosenberg LC, Yannas IV. Specific effect of glycosaminoglycans in an analog of extracellular matrix that delays wound contraction and induces regeneration. Wound Rep Reg 1994; 2: 270-276.
44. Chen CS, Yannas IV, Spector M. Pore strain behaviour of collagen-glycosaminoglycan analogues of extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 777-783.
45. Doane KJ, Birk DE. Fibroblasts retain their tissue phenotype when grown in three-dimensional collagen gels. Exper Cell Res 1991; 195: 432-442.
46. Doillon CJ, Wasserman AJ, Berg RA, Silver FH. Behaviour of fibroblasts and epidermal cells cultivated on analogues of extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 1988; 9: 91-96.
47. Ingber D, Folkman J Mechanochemical switching between growth and differentiation during fibroblast growth factor-stimulated angiogenesis in vitro: role of extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 1989; 109: 317-339.
48. Madri JA, Basson MD. Extracellular matrix-cell interactions: dynamic modulators of cell, tissue, and organism structure and function. Lab Invest 1992; 66: 519-521.
49. McCarthy J, Turley EA. Effects of extracellular matrix components on cell locomotion, Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1993; 4(5): 619-637.
50. Bosman FT. Integrins: cell adhesives and modulators of cell function. Histochem J 1993; 25(7): 469-477.
51. Kato YP, Silver FH. Formation of continuous collagen fibres: evaluation of biocompatibility and mechanical properties. Biomaterials 1990; 11: 169-175.
52. Ferdman A. Small-angle light scattering from dermal tissues. MIT Laser Res Center Rep 1986; 113-114.
53. Ferdman A, Yannas IV. Small-angle light scattering from histological sections of connective tissue. Trans Soc Biomater 1987; 10: 207.
54. Ferdman AG, Yannas IV. Scattering of light from histological sections: a new method for the analysis of connective tissue. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 100: 710-716.
55. Fujime S. Optical diffraction study of muscle fibers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1975; 379: 227-238.
56. Rudel R, Zite-Ferenczy F. Efficiency of light diffracted by cross-striated muscle fibres under stretch and during isometric contraction. Biophys J 1980; 30: 507-516.
57. Rimbrell V. Measurement of fibres in human lung tissue. IARC Sci Publ 1980; 30: 113-126.
58. Wilkes GL, Wilkes PH. Evidence for in vivo anisotropic rod structure in collagenous tissue as noted by small-angle light scattering. Biopolymers 1974; 13: 411-413.
59. Kronick PL, Buechler PR. Fiber orientation in calfskin by laser light or X-ray diffraction and quantitative relation to mechanical properties. J Am Leather Chem 1986; 81: 221-230.
60. Kronick PL, Sacks MS. Quantification of vertical-fiber defect in cattle hide by small-angle light scattering. Connect Tissue Res 1991; 27: 1-13.
61. Fawcett JW, Keynes RJ. Peripheral nerve regeneration. Ann Rev Neurosci 1990; 13: 43.
62. Suematsu N. Tubulation for peripheral nerve gap: its history and possibility. Microsurgery 1989; 10(1): 71-74.
63. Lundborg G, Gelberman RH, Longo FM, Powell HC, Varon S. In vivo regeneration of cut nerves encased in silicone tubes: growth across a six millimeter gap. J Neuropathol Exper Neurol 1982; 41: 412-422.
64. Williams LR, Longo FM, Powell HC, Lundborg G, Varon S. Spatial-temporal progress of peripheral nerve regeneration within a silicone chamber: parameters for a bioassay. J Comp Neurol 1983; 218: 460-470.
65. Fields RD, Ellisman MH. Axons regenerated through silicone tube splices. Exper Neurol 1986; 92: 61-74.
66. Fields DR, Le Beau JM, Longo FM, Ellisman MH. Nerve regeneration through artificial tubular implants. Prog Neurobiol 1989; 33: 87-134.
67. Archibald SJ, Krarup C, Shefner J, Li ST, Madison RD. A collagen-based nerve guide for peripheral nerve repair: an electrophysiological study of nerve regeneration in rodents and nonhuman primates. J Comp Neurol 1991; 306: 685-696.
68. den Dunnen WFA, Schakenraad JM, Zondervan GJ, Pennings AJ, van der Lei B, Robinson PH. A new PLLA/PCL copolymer for nerve regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1993; 4: 521-525.
69. der Dunnen WFA, van der Lei B, Schakenraad JM et al. Long-term evaluation of nerve regeneration in a biodegradable nerve guide. Microsurgery 1993; 14: 508-515.
70. Landstrom A, Yannas IV. Peripheral nerve regeneration. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, 2nd edn. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1995 (in press).