The design of reliability data bases, part I: Review of standard design concepts

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 137-146

  Cooke, Roger M ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; MAINTENANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

COLORED POISSON PROCESS; PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE; RELIABILITY DATA BASES;

RELIABILITY;

EID: 0030086627     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00111-5     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Azalarov, T. A. & Volodin, N. A., Characterization problems associated with the exponential distribution. Springer Verlag, New York, 1986.
2. Appignani, P. L. & Fragola J. R., Shuttle integrated risk assessment program: main propulsion system propellant management system: reliability failure data. SAIC, New York, 1991.
3. Bain, L. J., Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life-Testing Models. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1978.
4. Bedford, T. & Meilijson, I., A new approach to censored lifetime variables. Reliab. Engng System Safety, 51 (1996) 181-187.
5. Colt, D. W. & Priore, M. G., Impact of nonoperating periods on equipment reliability. RADC-TR-85-91, Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss Air Force Base, New York, 1985.
6. Cooke, R. M., The total time on test statistic and age-dependent censoring. Stat. and Prob. Let., 18 (1993) 307-312.
7. Cooke, R., Bedford, T. Meilijson, I. & Meester, L., Design of reliability data bases for aerospace applications. Report to the European Space Agency, Department of Mathematics, Report 93-110, Delft, 1993.
8. Cox, D. R., The analysis of exponentially distributed life-times with two types of failure. J. R. Statis. Soc., B21 (1959) 414-421.
9. Cox, D. R. & Lewis, P., The Statistical Analysis of Series of Events, Methuen, London, 1966.
10. Crowder, M., On the identifiability crisis in competing risk analysis, Scand. J. Statist., 18 (1991) 223-233.
11. Crowder, M., Identifiability crises in competing risks. Int. Stat. Review, 62 (1994) 379-391.
12. Crowder, M., Kimber, C. Smith, R. & Sweeting, T., Statistical Analysis of Reliability Data, Chapman & Hall, London, 1991.
13. David, H. A. & Moeschberger, M. L., The Theory of Competing Risks, Charles Griffin and Co. London, 1975.
14. EIREDA European Industry Reliability Data Handbook, C.E.C.-J.R.C./ISEI 21020 ISPRA (Varese) Italy, EDF-DER/SPT 93206 Saint Denis (Paris) France, 1991.
15. Fragola, J. R., Reliability data bases: the current picture. Hazard Prevention, Jan/Feb. (1987) 24-29.
16. Gail, M., A review and critique of some models used in competing risk analysis. Biometrics, 31 (1975) 209-222.
17. Green, A. E. & Bourne, A. J., Reliability Technology, Wiley, London, 1972.
18. Guidelines for Process Equipment Reliability Data, Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1989.
19. Johanson, G. & Fragola, J., Synthesis of the data base for the Ringhals 2 PRA using the Swedish ATV data system. Presented at ANS/ENS International Meeting on Thermal Reactor Safety, Chicago Ill, August 1982.
20. Kelly, D. & Seth, S., Data review methodology and implementation procedure for probabilistic safety assessments. HSK-AN-2602, MITRE corporation, Mclean Virginia MTR-93W0000153, 1993.
21. Kingman, J., Poisson Processes, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993.
22. IAEA, Component reliability data for use in probabilistic safety assessment. IAEA TECHDOC 478, Vienna, 1988.
23. IEEE Standard 500-1984, Piscataway, NJ, 1984.
24. Lenoir, P., Hermes failure rate data base. Aerospatiale Tech Doc H-AS-1-07-ASPR ed 2, 1992.
25. Military Handbook; reliability prediction of electronic equipment. MIL-HDBK-217F, Griffiss Air Force Base, Rome, New York, 1991.
26. Nelson, W., Accelerated Testing, New York, 1990.
27. OREDA Committee, Offshore Reliability Data, Hovik, Norway, 1984.
28. Tsiatis, A., A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. In Proc. National Academy of Sciences USA, 72 (1975) 20-22.
29. Paulsen, J. & Cooke, R., Concepts for measuring maintenance performance and methods for analyzing competing failure modes. In Proc. ESREL 94; 9th Int. Conf. on Reliability and Maintainability, La Baule, France, 1994.
30. Peterson, A. V., Expressing the Kaplan-Meier estimator as a function of empirical subsurvival functions. JASA, 72 (1977) 854-858.
31. Peterson, A. V., Bounds for a joint distribution function with fixed subdistribution functions: application to competing risks. In Proc. Nt. Acad. Sci. USA, 73 (1976) 11-13.
32. Porn, K., On empirical Bayesian inference applied to Poisson probability models. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Dissertation No. 234, Linköping, 1990.
33. Procedure and data for estimating reliability and maintainability. Engng Reliab., Martin Co., Denver, M-M-P-59-21; 1959.
34. T-Book Reliability Data of Components in Nordic Nuclear Power Plants, ATV office, Valllingby, Sweden.
35. Tomic, B., Multi-purpose in-plant data system. IAEA, Internal report, 1993.