Frequency-domain conditions for disturbance rejection and decoupling with stability or pole placement

Automatica

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 229-234

  Koussiouris, Trifon G ^a   Tzierakis, Konstantinos G ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Decoupling; Disturbance rejection; Linear systems; Stabilization

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONTROLLABILITY; FEEDBACK CONTROL; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; POLES AND ZEROS; POLYNOMIALS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATE SPACE METHODS; SYSTEM STABILITY; VECTORS;

DECOUPLING; DISTURBANCE REJECTION; LINE TIME INVARIANT SYSTEM; POLE PLACEMENT; POLYNOMIAL MATRIX APPROACH;

CONTROL THEORY;

EID: 0030086159     PISSN: 00051098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(96)85552-X     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Basile, G. and G. Marro (1969). Controlled and conditioned invariant subspaces in linear system theory. J. Optim. Theory Applic., 3, 306-315.
2. Bhattacharyya, S. P. (1980). Frequency domain conditions for disturbance rejection. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC-25, 1211-1213.
3. Chang, M.-F. and I. B. Rhodes (1975). Disturbance localization in linear systems with simultaneous decoupling, pole assignment, or stabilization. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC-20, 518-523.
4. Commault, C., J. M. Dion and J. Montoya (1993). Simultaneous decoupling and disturbance rejection: A structural approach. In Proc. European Control Conf '93, Groningen, The Netherlands, pp. 1138-1142.
5. Forney, G. D. (1975). Minimal bases of rational vector spaces, with applications to multivariable linear systems. SIAM J. Control, 13, 493-520.
6. Koussiouris, T. G. (1979). A frequency domain approach to the block decoupling problem. I. The solvability of the block decoupling by state feedback and a constant non-singular transformation. Int. J. Control, 29, 991-1010.
7. Koussiouris, T. G. (1980). A frequency domain approach to the block decoupling problem. II. Pole assignment while block decoupling a minimal system by state feedback and a constant non-singular transformation and the observability of the block decoupled system. Int. J. Control, 32, 443-464.
8. Koussiouris, T. G. (1982). The module structure of a controllable system. Int. J. Control, 35, 665-675.
9. Koussiouris, T. G. and B. Tyrlis (1994). On the solvability of Morgan's problem; pole assignment while decoupling by state feedback and a constant singular input transformation. IMA J. Math. Control Inf., 11, 111-131.
10. McFarlane, A. G. J. and N. Karcanias (1976). Poles and zeros of linear multivariable systems: a survey of the algebraic, geometric and complex-variable theory. Int. J. Control, 24, 33-74.
11. McLane, P. J. and E. J. Davison (1970). Disturbance localization and decoupling in stationary linear multivariable systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 15, 133-134.
12. Paraskevopoulos, P. N., F. N. Koumboulis and K. G. Tzierakis (1991). Disturbance rejection with simultaneous decoupling of linear time invariant systems. In Proc. European Control Conf. '91, Grenoble, France, pp. 1784-1788.
13. Paraskevopoulos, P. N., F. N. Koumboulis and K. G. Tzierakis (1992). Disturbance rejection of left invertible systems. Automatica, 28, 427-430.
14. Rosenbrock, H. H. (1970). State Space and Multivariable Theory, Nelson, London.
15. Silverman, L. M. and H. J. Payne (1971). Input-output structure of linear systems with application to the decoupling problem. SIAM J. Control, 9, 199-233.
16. Wolovich, W. A. (1974). Linear Multivariable Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York.
17. Wonham, W. M. and A. S. Morse (1970). Decoupling and pole assignment in linear multivariable systems. SIAM J. Control, 8, 1-18.