Multicriteria optimization using a genetic algorithm for determining a Pareto set

International Journal of Systems Science

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 255-260

  Viennet, R ^a   Fonteix, C ^a   Marc, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FOOD PROCESSING; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; OPTIMIZATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; PARETO SET;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 0030085393     PISSN: 00207721     EISSN: 14645319     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207729608929211     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aggahwal, N., Bhkry, C., and Quarrey, P., 1994, Une approche lingnisliquc dc 1‘aidc à la decision multicritère en environment certain. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems (IPMU), 4-8 July 1994, Paris, France, edited by B. Bouchon-Meunier, R. R. Yager and L. A. Zadeh, Vol. 2, pp. 650-655.
2. Bicking, F. Fonteix, C., Corriou, J. P., and Marc, I., 1994, Global optimization by artificial life: a new technique using genetic population evolution. RAIRO-Operation Research, 1, 23-36.
3. Derringer, G., and Suich, R., 1980, Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 12, 214-219.
4. Fonteix, C., Bicking, F„ Perrin, E., and Marc, I., 1995, Haploid and diploid algorithms, a new approach for global optimization: compared performances. International Journal of Systems Science, 26, 1919-1933.
5. Hamburg, I., 1994, The potential of fuzzy logic methods to support multicriteria group decision-making in the engineering design process. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems (IPMU), 4-8 July 1994, Paris, France, edited by B. Bouchon-Meunier, R, R. Yager and L. A. Zadeh, Vol. 2, pp. 633-637.
6. Harrington, E. C., 1965, The desirability function. Industrial Quality Control, 21, 494-498.
7. Horn, J., Nafpliotis, N., and Goldberg, D. E., A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for muiliobjective optimization. Proceedings of the first Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 82-87
8. Korhonen, P., and Laakso, J., 1986, A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 277-287.
9. Korhonen, P., and Wallenius, J., 1988, A Pareto race. NAVAL Research Logistics, 6, 615-623;
10. Korhonen, P., and Wallenius, J., 1990, A multiple objective linear programming decision support system. Decision Support Systems, 6, 243-251.
11. Logothetis, N., and Haigh, A., 1988, Characterizing and optimizing multi-response processes by the Taguchi method. Quality and Realibility Engineering International, 4, 159-169.
12. Narula, S. C., Kirilov, L., and Vassilev, V., 1994, Reference direction approach for solving multiple objective nonlinear programming problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 5, 804-806.
13. Schaffer, J. D., 1985, Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In Greffenstette, J. (Ed.) Proceedings of an International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and their Applications, pp. 93-100.
14. Steuer, R. E., 1986, Multiple criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application (New York: Wiley). •
15. WierzbiCKi, A., 1980, The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. In Fandel, G., and Gal, T. (Eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making Theory and Application (New York: SpringerVerlag).