Electronic theory for the transition from Fermi-liquid to non-Fermi-liquid behavior in high-Tc superconductors

Solid State Communications

Volumn 97, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 663-668

  Langer, M ^a   Schmalian, J ^a   Grabowski, S ^a   Bennemann, K H ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

A. High Tc superconductors

Indexed keywords

ANTIFERROMAGNETISM; CALCULATIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOPING (ADDITIVES); ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; QUANTUM THEORY;

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC SPIN FLUCTUATIONS; ELECTRONIC THEORY; FERMI LIQUID; FLUCTUATION EXCHANGE APPROXIMATION; HUBBARD MODEL; NON-FERMI LIQUID;

HIGH TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTORS;

EID: 0030083571     PISSN: 00381098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(95)00669-9     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. C.G. Olsen et al., Phys Rev. B42, 381 (1990).
2. B. Batlogg, H.Y. Hwang, H. Takagi, R.J. Cava, H.L. Kao & J. Kwo, Physica 234-240, 130 (1994).
3. H.Y. Hwang, et al., Phys Rev. Lett. 72, 2636 (1994).
4. B. Keimer et al., Phys. Rev. B46, 14034 (1992).
5. C.M. Varma, P.B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt-Rink, E. Abrahams & A.E. Ruckenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1996 (1989).
6. T. Imai, C.P. Slichter, K. Yoshimura & K. Kosuge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1002 (1993).
7. R.J. Birgenau et al., Phys. Rev. B38, 6614 (1988).
8. Z.X. Shen & D.S. Dessau, Phys Reports 255, 1 (1995) (and references therein).
9. P. Aebi, J. Osterwalder, P. Schwaller, L. Schlapbach, M. Shimoda, T. Mochiku & K. Kadowaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2757 (1994).
10. E. Dagotto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994) (and references therein).
11. N.E. Bickers & D.J. Scalapino, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 193, 206 (1989).
12. N.E. Bickers, D.J. Scalapino & S.R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 961 (1989).
13. G. Baym & L.P. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961); G. Baym, Phys. Rev. 127, 1391 (1962).
14. G. Baym & L.P. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961); G. Baym, Phys. Rev. 127, 1391 (1962).
15. Details will be published elsewhere. The results presented here were calculated on a lattice of size 64 × 64 lattice sites and with an energy resolution of 4096 points in the interval [-30t, 30t].
16. M. Langer, J. Schmalian, S. Grabowski & K.H. Bennemann, to be published in Phys. Rev. Lett.
17. A.P. Kampf & J.R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. B42, 7967 (1990).
18. It was shown that this is a reliable approximation which slightly overestimates the correlation length, see T. Dahm & L. Tewordt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 793 (1995).
19. k (ω) are substantialy weaker for the 32 × 32 lattice, whereas they differ only slightly between the 64 × 64 and the 128 × 128 lattice. Moreover, the conclusions of this paper concerning the FL properties and their breakdown are not affected by finite size effects for lattices of 64 × 64 sites or larger.
20. S. Wermbter & L. Tewordt, Phys. Rev. B48, 10514 (1993).
21. P.W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2992 (1991).
22. A Carrington, A.P. Mackenzie, C.T. Lin & J.R. Cooper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992).
23. Niizeki & K. Hoshino, J. Phys. C9, 3481 (1976).
24. N.D. Mermin & H. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966); D.K. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1584 (1971).
25. N.D. Mermin & H. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966); D.K. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1584 (1971).
26. S. Grabowski, J. Schmalian, M. Langer & K.H. Bennemann, unpublished.