Challenges in Feature-Based Manufacturing Research

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 77-85

  Mäntylä, Martti ^a   Nau, Dana ^b   Shah, Jami ^c  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b Helsinki University of Technology ^*  (United States)

^c Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURING DATA PROCESSING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PLANNING; PROCESS CONTROL; PRODUCTION CONTROL; PRODUCTIVITY;

FEATURE BASED MANUFACTURING; MANUFACTURING PROCESS MODELS; PROCESS PLANNING; STANDARD FOR EXCHANGE OF PRODUCT DATA;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 0030081974     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/230798.230808     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Boothroyd, G. Product design for manufacture and assembly. Comput.-Aided Des. 26, 7 (July 1994), 505-520.
2. Bourne, D., and Wang, C. Design and manufacturing of sheet metal parts: Using features to resolve manufacturability problems. In Computers in Engineering 1995, A. Busnaina, Ed. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), New York, 1995, pp. 745-753.
3. Bronsvoort, W., and Jansen, F. Multi-view feature modeling for design and assembly. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. Mäntylä, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 315-329.
4. Chang, T. Expert Process Planning for Manufacturing, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1990.
5. Chen, R., Navin-Chandra, D., and Prinz, F. A cost-benefit analysis model of product design for recyclability and its application. IEEE Trans. Manuf. Technol. (part A) 17, 4, (Dec. 1994), 67-87.
6. Das, D., Gupta, S., and Nau, D. Generating redesign suggestions to reduce setup cost: a step towards automated redesign. Comput.-Aided Des., forthcoming.
7. ElMaraghy, H., and ElMaraghy, W. Computer-aided inspection planning (CAIP). In Advances in feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. Mäntylä, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 363-396.
8. Geelink, R., Salomons, O., van Slooten, F., van Honten, F., and Kals, H. In A. Busnaina, Ed., Computers in Engineering 1995, Unified feature definition for feature based design and feature based manufacturing. ASME, New York, 1995, pp. 517-533.
9. Gupta, S., Kramer, T., Nau, D., Regli, W., and Zhang, G. Building MRSEV models for CAM applications. Advances in Engineering Software 20, 2/3 (1994), 121-139.
10. Gupta, S., Nau, D., Regli, W., and Zhang, G. A methodology for systematic generation and evaluation of alternative operation plans. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. Mäntylä, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 161-184.
11. Joshi, S., and Chang, T.-C. Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3-D solid model. Comput.-Aided Des. 20, 2 (March 1988), 58-66.
12. Juster, N., Hsu, L., and de Pennington, A. The selection of surfaces for inspection planning. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. Mäntylä, and D. Nan, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 333-362.
13. Kambhampati, S., Cutkosky, M., Tenenbaum, J., and Lee, S. Integrating general purpose planners and specialized reasoners: Case study of a hybrid planning architecture. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. 23, 6 (Nov./Dec. 1993).
14. Mäntylä, M. An Introduction to Solid Modeling. Computer Science Press, Rockville, Md., 1988.
15. Mäntylä, M., Opas, J., and Puhakka, J. Generative process planning of prismatic parts by feature relaxation, in Proc. of 15th ASME Design Automation Conference, B. Ravani, Ed., Montreal, Sept. 17-21, ASME, New York, 1989, pp. 49-60.
16. Owen, J. STEP - An Introduction. Information Geometers, Winchester, England, 1993.
17. Sakurai, H., and Chin, C. Definition and recognition of volume features for process planning. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. Mäntylä, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 65-80.
18. Shah, J.J., and Mäntylä, M. Parametric and Feature-Based CAD. Wiley, New York, 1995.
19. Shah, J.J., Shen, Y., and Shirur, A. Determination of machining volumes from extensible sets of design features. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. Mäntylä, and D. Nau Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 129-157.
20. Srikantappa, A., and Crawford, R. Automatic part coding based on interfeature relationships. In Advances in Feature Based Man ufacturing, J. Shah, M. Mäntylä, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Ams terdam, 1994, pp. 215-237.
21. Sturgill, M., Cohen, E., and Riesenfeld, F. Feature-based 3-D sketching for early stage design. In Computers in Engineering 1995, A. Busnaina, Ed., ASME, New York, 1995, pp. 545-552.
22. Wang, H.-P., and Li, J.-K. Computer-Aided Process Planning. Advance: in Industrial Engineering, vol. 13, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991.
23. Wozny, M., Pratt, M., and Poli, C. Topics in feature-based design and manufacturing. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. Mäntylä, and D. Nau, Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 481-510.
24. Yue, Y., and Murray, J. Workpiece selection and clamping of complex 2.5D components. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. Mäntylä, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 185-214.