Decision support for patient care: Computerized rating scales

Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 25-29

  Kobak, Kenneth A ^a,e   Greist, John H ^b,c,d,e   Jefferson, James W ^b,d,e   Katzlenick, David J ^b,d,e  

^a HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Dean Foundation

^c Psychiatric Computing Laboratory

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e Dean Foundation for Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030079685     PISSN: 10638490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kleinke, J.D. Medicine's industrial revolution. Wall Street Journal, August 11, 1995, A8.
2. Maynard, A. Cost management: The economist's view point. British Journal of Psychiatry 163:7-13,1993.
3. Greenberg, P.E., Stiglin, L.E., Finkelsteirn, S.N., & Berndt, E.R. The economic burden of depression in 1990. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 54:405-418, 1993.
4. Eisenberg, L. Medicine-molecular, monetary, or more than both? JAMA 274:331-334, 1995.
5. Minichiello, W.E., Baer, L. Managed care: Our behavioral imperative. Behavior Therapist 17:22, 1994.
6. Kobak, K.A., Reynolds, W.M., Rosenfeld, R., Greist, J.H. Development and validation of a computer-administered version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2:56-63, 1990.
7. Kobak, K.A., Reynolds, W.M., Greist, J.H. Development and validation of a computer-administered version of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5:487-492, 1993.
8. Rosenfeld, R., Dar, R., Andersen, D., et al. A computer-administered version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. Psychological Assessment 4:329-332, 1992.
9. Katzelnick, D.J., Kobak, K.A., Greist, J.H., Jefferson, J.W. Sertraline in social phobia: A double-blind, place bo-controlled crossover study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152:1368-1371, 1995.
10. Naditch, M.P. Shifting to a new paradigm to measure clinical outcomes. Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, May/June 1994, 51-55.
11. Blouin, A.G., Perez, E.L., Blouin, J.H. Computer administration of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Psychiatric Research, 23:335-344, 1988.
12. Erdman, H.P., Klein, M.H., Greist, J.H., et al. A comparison of two computer-administered versions of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Journal of Psychiatric Research 26:85-95, 1992.
13. First, M.B., Gibbon, M., Williams, J.B.W., Spitzer, R.L. Mini-SCID, Version 2. North Tonawanda, NY: MHS, 1995.
14. Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B., Kroenke, K., et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: The PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA 272:1749-1756, 1994.
15. Broadhead, W.E., Leon, A., Weissman, M.M., et al. Development and validation of the SDDS-PC screen for multiple mental disorders in primary care. Arch Fam Med 4:211-219, 1995.
16. Baer, L., Brown-Beasley, M.W., Sorce, J., et al. Computer-assisted telephone administration of a structured interview for obsessive-compulsive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150:1737-1738, 1993.
17. Ware, J.E., Sherbourne, C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30:473-483, 1992.
18. Kobak, K.A., Reynolds, W.M., Greist, J.H. Computerized and clinician assessment of depression and anxiety: Respondent evaluation and satisfaction. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63:173-180, 1994.
19. Petrie, K., Abell, W. Responses of parasuicides to a computerized interview. Computers in Human Behavior, 10:415-418, 1994.
20. Hofer, P.J., Green, B.F. The challenge of competence and creativity in computerized psychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53:826-838, 1985.
21. Wilson, F.R., Genco, K.T., Yager, G.G. Assessing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil versus computerized tests: Demonstration of a promising methodology. Computers in Human Behavior 1:265-275, 1985.
22. Butcher, J.N. Psychological assessment by computer: Potential gains and problems to avoid. Psychiatric Annals 24:20-24, 1994.
23. American Psychological Association. Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations. Washington, DC, 1986.