A single positive prostatic biopsy out of six systematic biopsies is not correlated with the intracapsular nature of the tumour, on an individual level;Une seule biopsie prostatique positive sur six biopsies systématisées n'est pas corrélée sur un plan individuel au caractère intracapsulaire de la tumeur

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 70-75

  Ravery, Vincent ^a,c   Szabo, Janos ^a   Billebaud, Thierry ^a   Toublanc, Marianne ^b   Boccon Gibod, Liliane ^a   Hermieu, Jean François ^a   Delmas, Vincent ^a   Boccongibod, Laurent ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHES INTERNATIONALES SERVIER   (France)

^b ARMAND TROUSSEAU HOSPITAL   (France)

^c BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Cancer; Prostate; Radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; CANCER STAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 0030077224     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. ACKERMAN D.A., BARRY J.M., WICKLUND R.A. Analysis of risk factors associated with prostate cancer extension to the surgical margin and pelvic node metastasis at radical prostatectomy. J. Urol., 1993, 150, 1845-1850.
2. CUPP M.R., BOSTWICK D.G., MYERS R.P The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis J. Urol , 1995, 153, 1543-1548
3. DANESHGARI F., TAYLOR G.D., MILLER G.J. Computer simulation of the probability of detecting low volume carcinoma of the prostate with six random systematic core biopsies. Urology. 1995, 45, 604-609.
4. EPSTEIN J.I. Diagnostic criteria of limited adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy. Hum., Pathol., 1995, 26, 223-229.
5. HODGE K.K., McNEAL J.E., TERRIS M.K. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J. Urol., 1989, 142, 71-75.
6. Mc NEAL J.E., BOSTWICK D.G., KINDRACHUK R.A. Patterns of progression in prostate cancer Lancet. 1986, 1: 60-63.
7. PELLER P.A., YOUNG D.C , MARMADUKE D.P. Sextant prostate biopsies. A histopathologic correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. Cancer. 1995, 75, 530-538.
8. RAVERY V., BOCCON-GIBOD L., DAUGE-GEFFROY MC., et al.: Systematic biopsies accurately predict extracapsular extension of prostate cancer and persistant / recurrent detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy. Urology, 1994, 44, 371-376.
9. STAMEY TA. Making the most out of MX systematic sextant biopsies. Urology. 1995, 45, 2-12.
10. STRICKER H.J., RUDDOCK L.J., WAN J. Detection of non-palpable prostate cancer. A mathematical and laboratory model. Br. J. Urol , 1993, 71, 43-46.
11. TEMPANY C.M., ZHOU X., ZERHOUNI E.A. Staging of prostate cancer: results of radiology diagnostic oncology group project Comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Radiology, 1994, 192: 47-54.
12. TERRIS M.K., McNEAL J.E., STAMEY T.A. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsies. J. Urol., 1992, 148, 829-832.