Effect of two dentinal desensitizing agents on retention of complete cast coping using four cements

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 129-134

  Mausner, Irena K ^a,b   Goldstein, Gary R ^a   Georgescu, Maria ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALL BOND SYSTEM; ALL-BOND SYSTEM; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; IMPERVA BOND; IMPERVA-BOND; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0030076846     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90088-8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodonties. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publ Co, 1981: chap 5.
2. Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability; effect of crown preparation. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:219-25.
3. Brannstrom M. Dentin sensitivity and aspiration of odontoblasts. J Am Dent Assoc 1963;55:366-9.
4. Brannstrom M, Linden LA, Astrom A. The hydrodynamics of the dentinal tubule and of pulpal fluid: a discussion of its significance in relation to dental sensitivity. Caries Res 1967;1:310-7.
5. Bergenholtz G, Cox C, Loesche W, Syed S. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: it's effect on the pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-50.
6. Bergenholtz G. Inflammatory response of the dental pulp to bacterial irritation. J Endodont 1981;7:100-4.
7. Pashlely DH. Smear layer - physiological considerations. Oper Dent 1984;9(Suppl 3):13-29.
8. Langland H, Langland LK. Pulp reaction to crown preparation, impression, temporary crown fixation, and permanent cementation. J PROSTHET DENT 1965;15:129-43.
9. Smith DC, Ruse ND. Acidity of glass ionomer cements during setting and its relation to pulp sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:654-7.
10. Zaimoglu A, Kevser A. An evaluation of smear layer with various desensitizing agents after tooth preparation. J PROSTHET DENT 1992;68:450-7.
11. Stanley HR. Local and systemic responses to dental composites and glass ionomers. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:55-7.
12. Van de Voorde A, Gredts GJ, Murchison DF. Clinical uses of glass ionomer cement: a literature review. Quint Int 1988;19:53-61.
13. Pameijer CH, Stanley HR. Primate response to anhydrous Chembond [Abstract]. J Dent Res 1984;63:171.
14. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992;17:13-20.
15. Ianzano J, Gwinnett AJ, Westbay G. Polymeric sealing of dentinal tubules to control sensitivity. Periodont Clin Investig 1993;15:113-6.
16. Morrow RM, Rudd KD, Rhoads JE. Dental laboratory procedures. 2nd ed. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1986:171-231.
17. Scherer W. Adhesive resin cements. Calif Dent Instit Contin Educ 1992;43:29-40.
18. Cox C, Keall H, Ostrow E, Bergenholts G. Biocompatibility of surfacesealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J PROSTHET DENT 1987;57:1-8.
19. Gorodovsky S, Zidan O. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements. J PROSTHET DENT 1992;68:269-74.
20. Phillips RW. Science of dental materials. 9th ed. Philadelphia: W B Saunders Co, 1991:479-95.
21. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Denehy GE, Wefel JS, Donly KJ. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 1994;73:44-55.
22. White SN, Yu Z. Physical properties of fixed prosthodontic resin composite luting agents. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:384-9.