Conducting research in respondents' homes: Benefits, problems, and strategies

Applied Nursing Research

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 37-40

  Belza, Basia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; APPOINTMENTS AND SCHEDULES; ARTHRITIS; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; SAN FRANCISCO;

EID: 0030076742     PISSN: 08971897     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0897-1897(96)80379-x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Bradburn, N. (1983). Response effects. In P. Rossi, F. Wright, & A. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 289-328). New York: Academic Press.
2. Collins, C., Given, B., Given, C., & King, S. (1988). Interview training and supervision. Nursing Research, 37, 122-124.
3. Given, B., Keilman, L., Collins, C., & Given, C. (1990). Strategies to minimize attrition in longitudinal studies. Nursing Research, 39, 184-186.
4. McCausland, M., & Burgess, A. (1989). The home visit for data, collection. Applied Nursing Research, 2, 54-55.