Influence of storage conditions of extracted teeth on dentine removal by a standardised method of filing

Endodontics and Dental Traumatology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 25-32

  Lam May Cheng, J A ^a   Gulabivala, K ^a,b  

^a Dental Institute   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dental cavity preparation; Dentin; Root canal instrumentation

Indexed keywords

FORMALDEHYDE; HYPOCHLORITE SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TIME; TISSUE PRESERVATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTIN; FORMALDEHYDE; HUMANS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE PRESERVATION;

EID: 0030075973     PISSN: 01092502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. WILDEY WL, SENIA S, MONTGOMERY S. Another look at root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 499-507.
2. MCCANN JT, KELLER DL, LABOUNTY GL. Remaining dentine/ cementum thickness after hand or ultrasonic instrumentation. J Endod 1990; 16: 109-13.
3. BRIGGS PFA, GULABIVALA K, STOCK CJR, SETCHELL DJ. The dentine removing characteristics of an untrasonically energised K-file. Int Endod J 1989; 22: 259-68.
4. AHMAD M, PITT FORD TR. A comparison using macroradiography of canal shapes in teeth instrumented ultrasonically and by hand. J Endod 1989; 15: 339-44.
5. REGAN JD. An in vitro investigation of endosonic instrumentation. MSc Thesis, University of London 1989.
6. REYNOLDS MA, MADISON S, WALTON RE, KRELL KV. An in vitro histological comparison of the step-back, sonic and ultrasonic instrumentation techniques in small, curved root canals. J Endod 1987; 13: 307-14.
7. ALLISON DA, WEBBER CR, WALTON RE. The influence of the method of canal preparation on the quality of apical and coronal obturation. J Endod 1979; 5: 298-304.
8. HUANG, TG, SCHILDER H, NATHANSON D. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentine. J Endod 1992; 18: 209-15.
9. SAKAE T, MISHIMA H, KOZAWA Y. Changes in bovine dentine material with sodium hypochlorite treatment. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 1229-34.
10. TOTAH VP. Increase in hardness of dentine on drying. J Dent Res 1942; 21: 99-101.
11. SEDGLEY CM, MESSER HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992; 18: 332-35.
12. JAMESON MW, HOOD JAA, TIDMARSH BG. Effect of dehydration on the biomechanical properties of human dentine. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 537 (IADR abstract 178).
13. LEV R, READER AL, BECK M, MEYERS W. An in vitro comparison of the stepback technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique for 1 and 3 minutes. J Endod 1987; 13: 523-30.
14. OUTHWAITE WC, LIVINGSTONE MJ, PASHLEY DH. Effects of changes in surface area, thickness, temperature and post-extraction time on human dentine permeability. Arch Oral Biol 1976; 21: 599-603.
15. GOODIS HE, MARSHALL GW, WHITE JM. Effect of storage after extraction of the teeth on human dentine permeability in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 1991; 36: 561-66.
16. FUSAYAMA T, OKUSE K, HOSODA H. Relationship between hardness, discolouration and microbial invasion in carious dentine. J Dent Res 1966; 45: 1033-46.
17. CRAIG RE, PEYTON FA. The microhardness of enamel and dentine. J Dent Res 1958; 37: 661-68.
18. STENMAN E, SPÅNGBERG LSW. Machining efficiency of endodontic files: A new methodology. J Endod 1990; 16: 375-82.
19. NEWMAN JG, BRANTLEY WA, GERSTEIN H. A study of the cutting efficiency of seven brands of endodontic files in linear motion. J Endod 1983; 9: 316-22.
20. STENMAN E, SPÅNGBERG LSW. Machining efficiency of Flex-R, K-Flex, Trio-cut and S-files. J Endod 1990; 16: 575-79.
21. STENMAN E, SPÅNGBERG LSW. Root canal instruments are poorly standardised. J Endod 1993; 19: 327-34.
22. LUMLEY PJ, WALMSLEY AD, HARRINGTON E, MARQUIS PM. Variations in stroke rate and loading using hand, sonic or ultrasonic instrumentation. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993; 9: 153-56.
23. YGUEL-HENRY S, VANNESSON H, VON STEBUT J. High precision, simulated cutting and efficiency measurement of endodontic root canal instruments: Influence of file configuration and lubrication. J Endod 1990; 16: 418-22.
24. MACHIAN GR, PETERS DD, LORTON L. The comparative efficiency of four types of endodontic instruments. J Endod 1982; 8: 398-402.
25. TSENG PSK. An in vitro evaluation of the influence of endodontic instrumentation on the anatomy of curved root canals using the image analyser. MSc Thesis, University of London 1990.
26. KESSLER JR, PETERS DD, LORTON L. Comparison of the relative risk of molar root perforations using various endodontic instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1983; 9: 439-47.
27. WATERS NE. Some mechanical and physical properties of teeth. In: Vincent JFK, Curry JD, ed. The mechanical properties of biological materials. Cambridge: University Press 1980; 108.
28. ZACH A, KAUFMAN AY. Quantitative evaluation of the influence of dequalinium acetate and sodium hypochlorite on human dentition. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983; 55: 524-26.