Factors related to the initiation of prenatal care in the adolescent nullipara

Nurse Practitioner

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 26-42

  Baker, Teresa Jones ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

^b Haywood Women s Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY; ADOLESCENTS; ADOLESCENTS, FEMALE; AGE; ARTICLE; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; FEMALE; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; JUVENILE; MATERNAL-CHILD HEALTH SERVICES; METHODOLOGY; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN AMERICA; NURSING THEORY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARITY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POPULATION; POPULATION AND POPULATION RELATED PHENOMENA; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM ACCESSIBILITY; PROGRAMS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CARE; STATISTICAL STUDIES; STUDIES; TIME; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE;

ADOLESCENTS; ADOLESCENTS, FEMALE; AGE FACTORS; AMERICAS; CORRELATION STUDIES; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; HEALTH; HEALTH SERVICES; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MATERNAL-CHILD HEALTH SERVICES; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN AMERICA; ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION; POPULATION; POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREGNANT WOMEN; PRENATAL CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM ACCESSIBILITY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROGRAMS; RESEARCH METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL STUDIES; STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; YOUTH;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; NURSING THEORY; PARITY; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN ADOLESCENCE; PRENATAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0030073150     PISSN: 03611817     EISSN: 15388662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00006205-199602000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Public Health Service: Healthy people 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives (DHMS Publication No. PI IS 91-502 12). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health and Hum an Services 1990.
2. Kinsman SB, Slap GB: Barriers to adolescent prenatal care. J Adolese Health 1992;13:146-54.
3. Melnikow J, Alemagno SA, Rottman C, et al: Characteristics of inner-city women giving birth with little or no prenatal care: A case-control study. J Fam Pract 1991;32:283-88.
4. Poland ML, Ager JW, Olson JM: Barriers to receiving adequate prenatal care. Am J Obstct Gynccol 1987; 157:297-303.
5. Burks JA: Factors in the utilization of prenatal services by low-income black women. Nurse Practitioner 1992; 17(4):34, 46, 49.
6. Schupliolme A, Robertson EG, Kamos AS: Barriers to prenatal carc in a multiethnic, urban sample. J Nurse Midwifery 1991; 36: 111-16.
7. Cartwright PS, McLaughlin FJ, Martinez AM, et al: Teenagers’ perceptions of barriers to prenatal care. South Med J 1993; 86:737-41.
8. Gihlin PT, Poland ML, Ager JW: Effects of social supports on attitudes, health behaviors and obtaining prenatal care. J Coniniunity Health 1990; 16-.357-68.
9. Young CL, McMahon J, Bowman VM, et al: Adolescent third-trimestcr enrollment in prenatal care. J Adolesc Health Care 1989; 10:393-97.
10. Fisher MJ, Ewigman B, Campbell J, et al: Cognitive factors influencing women to seek care during pregnancy. Fam Med 1991; 23:443-46.
11. Kriegei, JW, Connell FA, LoGcrfo JP: Medicaid prenatal care: A comparison of use and outcomes in fec-for-service and managed carc. Am j Public Health 1992; 82:185-90.
12. Blnestein D, Rutledge CM: Determinants of delayed pregnancy testing among adolescents. J Fam Pract 1992; 35:406-10.
13. Kalnuiss D, Fennelly K: Barriers to prenatal care among Iow-income women in New York City. Fam Phinn Perspect 1990; 22:215-31.
14. Lee SH, Grubbs LM: A comparison of self-reported self-care practiccs of pregnant adolescents. Nurse Practitioner 1993; 18(9):25-29.
15. Brown SS (ed): Prenatal Care: Reaching Mothers, Reaching Infants. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988.
16. Orem DE: Nursing: Concepts of Practice, 4th ed. St. Louis, Mosby Year Book, 1991.
17. Gast HL, Denyes MJ, Campbell JC, et al: Self-care agency: Conceptualizations and operationalizations. Advances in Nursing Science 1989;12(1):26-38.
18. Slusher IL: Conditioning factor data collection tool. (Available from I. L. SI usher, Birniinghani: University of Alabama), 1992.
19. McLaughlin GH: SMOG grading-a new readability formula. Journal of Reading 1969;12:639-47.
20. Denyes MJ: Denyes, Self-Care Agency Instrunicnt-90. (Available from M. J. Denyes, Detroit: Wayne State University), 1990.
21. Denyes MJ: Orem’s model used for health promotion: Directions from research. Advances in Nursing Science 1988; 11(1): 13-21.
22. Frey MA, Denyes MJ. Health and illness self-care in adolescents with IDDM: A test of Orem’s theory. Advances in Nursing Science 1989; 12(1):67-75.
23. McBride SH: Comparative Analysis of three instruments designed to measure self-care agency. Nurs Res 1991; 40(1): 12-16.
24. Boyce WT, Chesternian EA, Winkleby MA: Psychosocial predictors of maternal and infant health among adolescent mothers. Am J of Dis Child 1991;145:267-273.