Undergraduate Research and the Institutional Review Board: A Mismatch or Happy Marriage?

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 20-25

  Kallgren, Carl A ^a   Tauber, Robert T ^a  

^a BEHREND COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EDUCATION; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY;

ATTITUDE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS; ETHICS COMMITTEES; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 0030072395     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: 15322802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top2301_3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adair J. G., Lindsay R. C. L., Carlopio J. (1983). Social artifact research and ethical regulations: Their impact on the teaching of experimental methods. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 159–162.
2. Brehm S., Brehm J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic.
3. Ceci S. J., Peters D., Plotkin J. (1985). Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. American Psychologist, 40, 994–1002.
4. Christensen L. (1988). Deception in psychological research: When is its use justified?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 664–675.
5. Deci E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
6. Eaton W. O. (1983). The reliability of ethical reviews: Some initial empirical findings. Canadian Psychologist, 24, 14–18.
7. Finney P. D. (1987). When consent information refers to risk and deception: Implications for social research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 37–48.
8. Goldman J., Katz M. D. (1982). Inconsistency and institutional review boards. Journal of the American Medical Association, 248. 197–202.
9. Grisso T., Baldwin E., Blanck P. D., Rotheram-Borus M. J., Schooler N. R., Thompson T. (1991). Standards in research: APA's mechanism for monitoring the challenges. American Psychologist, 46, 758–766.
10. Hamsher J. H., Reznikoff M. (1967). Ethical standards in psychological research and graduate training: A study of attitudes within the profession. Proceedings of the 75th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 2, 203–204.
11. Kimmel A. J. (1991). Predictable biases in the ethical decision making of American psychologists. American Psychologist, 46, 786–788.
12. Matthews J. R. (1991). The teaching of ethnics and the ethics of teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 80–85.
13. McGovern T. V., Furumoto L., Halpem D. F., Kimble G. A., McKeachie W. J. (1991). Liberal education, study in depth, and the arts and sciences major—Psychology. American Psychologist, 46, 598–605.
14. Stanley B., Sieber J. E., Melton G. B. (1987). Empirical studies of ethical issues in research: A research agenda. American Psychologist, 42, 735–741.
15. Trice A. D., Ogden E. P. (1987). Informed consent: IX. Effects of the withdrawal clause in longitudinal research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 135–138.
16. Tymchuk A. J., Thompson J. H. (1986). Academic senate members’ knowledge of federal requirements for the protection of human subjects in research. Psychological Reports, 59, 323–328.
17. Wicker A. W. (1968). Requirements for protecting privacy of human subjects: Some implications for generalization of research findings. American Psychologist, 23, 70–72.