Combinatorial evaluation of six dispatching rules in a dynamic two-machine flow shop

Omega

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 73-81

  Sarper, Huseyin ^a,c   Henry, M C ^b  

^a Malik and Seeme Hasan School of Business   (United States)

^b ADAMS STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

^c University of Southern Colorado   (United States)

Author keywords

Limited buffer space; Simulation; Two machine flow shop

Indexed keywords

DISPATCHING RULES; DYNAMIC FLOWS; FLOW-SHOPS; LIMITED BUFFER SPACES; MACHINE DYNAMICS; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; POISSON PROCESS; SIMULATION; TWO MACHINE FLOW SHOP; TWO MACHINES; DISPATCHING RULE; FLOW SHOP; PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT; PRODUCTION SYSTEM;

MACHINE SHOP PRACTICE; SCHEDULING;

QUEUEING THEORY; SIMULATION;

EID: 0030072218     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00049-6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. 1. Baker KR (1984) Sequencing rules and due-date assignments in a job shop. Mgmt Sci. 30, 1093-1104.
2. 2. Baker KR and Bertrand JWM (1982) A dynamic priority rule for scheduling against due-dates. J. Opl Mgmt 3, 37-42.
3. 3. Baker KR and Kanet JJ. (1983) Job shop scheduling with modified due dates. J. Opl Mgmt 4, 11-22.
4. 4. Barrett RT and Barman S (1986) A SLAM II simulation study of a simplified flow shop. Simulation 47, 181-189.
5. 5. Bassett G (1991 ) Job-shop operations reform: strategies for achieving queueless work flow. Int. J. Opns Prod. Mgmt 11, 55-71.
6. 6. Berkley BJ (1993) Effect of buffer capacity and sequencing rules on single-card kanban system performance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 31, 2875-2893.
7. 7. Cheng TCE and Gupta MC (1989) Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions. Eur. J. Opl Res. 38, 156-166.
8. 8. Cook DP (1994) A simulation comparison of traditional, JIT and TOC manufacturing systems in a flow shop with bottlenecks. Prod. Invent. Mgmt J. 1st Quarter, 73-78.
9. 9. Gopalan MN and Anatharaman N (1992) Stochastic modelling of a two-stage transfer line production system with end buffer and random demand. Microlectron. Reliab. 32, 11-15.
10. 10. Gross D and Harris M (1985) Fundamentals of Queueing Theory, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York.
11. 11. Hatcher JM (1969) The effect of internal storage on the production rate of series of stages having exponential service times. AIIE Trans. 1, 150-156.
12. 12. Henry MC (1993) Evaluation of dispatching rules in a dynamic two machine flow shop with extensions. M.S. thesis, University of Southern Colorado, Pueblo, Colo.
13. 13. Hunsucker JL and Shah JR (1992) Performance of priority rules in a due date flow shop. Omega 20, 73-89.
14. 14. Hunsucker JL and Shah JR (1994) Comparative performance analysis of priority rules in a constrained flow shop with multiple processors. Eur. J. Opl. Res. 72, 102-114.
15. 15. Johns SL and Hon B (1993) Control mechanism for stable lead times. Int. J. Prod. Res. 31, 429-441.
16. 16. Lau H (1994) Allocating work to a two-stage production system with interstage buffer. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 36, 281-289.
17. 17. Lui CM and Lin CL (1994) Performance evaluation of unbalanced serial production lines. Int. J. Prod. Res. 32, 2897-2914.
18. 18. Mahmoodi F et al. (1992) Dynamic group scheduling heuristic in a flow-through cell environment. Decis. Sci. 23, 61-84.
19. 19. McGee G and Webster D (1976) An investigation of a two-stage production line with normally distributed interarrival and service time distributions. Int. J. Prod. Res. 14, 251-261.
20. 20. Meral S and Erkip N (1991) Simulation analysis of a JIT production line. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 24, 147-156.
21. 21. Narasimhan SL and Mangiameli PM (1987) A comparison of sequencing rules for a two-stage hybrid flow shop. Decis. Sci. 18, 250-265.
22. 22. Narasimhan SL and Panwalker SC (1984) Scheduling in a two-stage manufacturing process. Int. J. Prod. Res. 22, 555-564.
23. 23. Park YB (1988) An evaluation of static flowshop scheduling heuristics in dynamic flowshop models via a computer simulation. Computers industr. Engng 14, 103-112.
24. 24. Park T and Steudel HJ (1991) A model for determining job throughout times for manufacturing flow line workcells with finite buffers. Int. J. Prod. Res. 28, 2025-2041.
25. 25. Pegden CD (1986) SIMAN User's Manual. Systems Modelling Corporation, Sewickley, Pa.
26. 26. Pike R and Martin GE (1994) The bowl phenomenon in unpaced lines. Int. J. Prod. Res. 32, 483-499.
27. 27. Ramasesh R (1990) Dynamic job shop scheduling: a survey of simulation results. Omega 18, 43-57.
28. 28. Rochette R and Sadowski RP (1976) A statistical comparison of the performance of simple dispatching rules for a particular set of job shops. Int. J. Prod. Res. 14, 63-75.
29. 29. Sarper H (1994) Evaluation of simple dispatching rules for dynamic single-machine earliness/tardiness problem. Prod. Plann. Control 5, 185-192.
30. 30. So KC (1990) The impact of buffering strategies on the performance of production line systems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 28, 2293-2307.
31. 31. Suresh V and Chaudhuri D (1993) Dynamic scheduling. A survey of research. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 32, 53-63.
32. 32. Udo GJ (1994) A simulation study of due-date assignment rules in a dynamic job shop. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45, 1425-1435.