Effect of subgrid models on the computed interscale energy transfer in isotropic turbulence

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 165-180

  Menon, S ^a   Yeung, P K ^a   Kim, W W ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRIDS; ISOTROPIC; SIMULATION-NUMERICAL; SUBGRID MODELS; TURBULENCE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; ENERGY TRANSFER; HEAT FLUX; REYNOLDS NUMBER; STRESSES; TURBULENCE;

DYNAMIC EDDY VISCOSITY MODEL; ISOTROPIC TURBULENCE; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; SCALE SIMILARITY MODEL; SMAGORINSKY EDDY VISCOSITY MODEL; SUBGRID ENERGY FLUX; SUBGRID KINETIC ENERGY MODEL; SUBGRID STRESS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 0030072027     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7930(95)00036-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. M. Germano, U. Piomelli, P. Moin and W. H. Cabot, A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A 3, 1760 (1991).
2. P. Moin, D. Carati, T. Lund, S. Ghosal and K. Akselvoll, Developments and applications of dynamic models for large eddy simulations of complex flows. Proc. 74th AGARD/FDP Symp. on Application of Direct and Large Eddy Simulation to Transition and Turbulence, AGARD CP-551 (1995).
3. U. Piomelli and J. Liu, Large-eddy simulations of rotating channel flows using a localized dynamic model. Phys. Fluids 7, 839 (1995).
4. S. Ghosal, T. S. Lund, P. Moin and K. Akselvoll, A dynamic localization model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 289, 229 (1995).
5. R. S. Rogallo, Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence, NASA TM 81315 (1981).
6. S. Menon and P.-K. Yeung, Analysis of subgrid models using direct and large eddy simulations of isotropic turbulence. Proc. 74th AGARD/FDP Symp. on Application of Direct and Large Eddy Simulation to Transition and Turbulence, AGARD CP-551 (1995).
7. V. Eswaran and S. B. Pope, An examination of forcing in direct numerical simulations of turbulence. Comput. Fluids 16, 257 (1988).
8. U. Piomelli, P. Moin and J. H. Ferziger, Model consistency in large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows. Phys. Fluids 31, 1884 (1988).
9. S. Liu, C. Meneveau and J. Katz, On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 275, 83 (1994).
10. D. K. Lilly, On the application of the eddy viscosity concept in the inertial sub-range of turbulence, NCAR manuscript 123 (1966).
11. D. K. Lilly, A proposed modification of the germano subgrid-scale closure model. Phys. Fluids 4, 633 (1992).
12. A. Yoshizawa and K. Horiuti, A statistically-derived subgrid scale kinetic energy model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 54, 2834 (1985).
13. W.-W. Kim and S. Menon, On the properties of a localized dynamic subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulations. Submitted to J. Fluid Mech. (1995).
14. U. Piomelli, W. H. Cabot, P. Moin and S. Lee, Subgrid-scale backscatter in turbulent and transitional flows. Phys. Fluids A 3, 1766 (1991).
15. J. R. Chasnov, Simulation of the Kolmogorov inertial subrange using an improved subgrid model. Phys. Fluids A 3, 188 (1991).
16. C. E. Leith, Stochastic backscatter in a subgrid-scale model: plane shear mixing layer. Phys. Fluids A 2, 297 (1990).
17. S. Menon, A numerical study of secondary fuel injection control of combustion instability in a ramjet, AIAA Paper 92-0777 (1992).
18. D. Carati, S. Ghosal and P. Moin, On the representation of backscatter in dynamic localization models. Phys. Fluids 7, 606 (1995).
19. J. Bardina, J. H. Ferziger and W. C. Reynolds, Improved subgrid scale models for large eddy simulations, AIAA Paper 80-1357 (1980).
20. J. A. Domaradzki, W. Liu and M. E. Brachet, An analysis of subgrid scale interactions in numerically simulated isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 5, 1747 (1993).