Twenty-year review of a breast cancer screening project: Ninety-five percent survival of patients with nonpalpable cancers

Cancer

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 104-106

  Letton, A Hamblin ^a,b   Mason, E M ^a   Ramshaw, Bruce J ^a  

^a ATLANTA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Harris Cancer Center   (United States)

Author keywords

asymptomatic; follow up; nonpalpable; routine screening; survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GEORGIA; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0030070418     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<104::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-9     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Letton AH, Wilson JP, Lamis PA, Stanton PS. The problems and results in a breast screening program. Proceedings of the International Conference on Breast Cancer, Lucerne, Switzerland. July 1977. In: Breast Cancer (vol. 12). New York: Alan R. Liss, 1977:189.
2. Letton AH, Mason EM. Routine breast screening. Ann Surg 1986; 203(5):470.
3. Telegram to Directors of BCDDP from Cancer Control Division of NCI. August 1976.
4. Westat, Inc. Statistical Division, 1850 Research Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland.