Reliability of paper-pencil assessment of drug use severity

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 109-122

  Heithoff, Kim A ^a   Wiseman, Eve J ^b,c  

^a MEDSTAT GROUP   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^c John L McClellan Mem Vet Aff H   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT;

EID: 0030066593     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00952999609001648     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. McGovern, M. P., and Morrison, D. H., The chemical use, abuse, and dependence scale (CUAD): Rationale, reliability, and validity, J. Substance Abuse Treatment 9:27-38 (1992).
2. McLellan, A. T., Paikh, G., Bragg, A., Caciola, J., Fureman, B., and Incmikoski, R., Addiction Severity Index.: Administration Manual, 5th ed., Pennsylvania Veterans' Administration Center for Studies of Addition, Philaelphia, 1990.
3. Cottler, L. B., Robins, L. N., and Heizer, J. E., The reliability of the CIDI-SAM: A comprehensive substance abuse interview, Br. J. Addict. 84:801-814 (1989).
4. Hesselbrock, M., Babor, T. F., Hesselbrock, V., Meyer, R. E., and Workman, K., "Never believe an alcoholic?" On the validity of self-report measures of alcohol dependence and related constructs, Int. J. Addict. 18(5):593-609 (1983).
5. Barbor, T. F., Brown, J., and Del Boca, F. K., Validity of self-reports in applied research on addictive behaviors: Fact or fiction? Behavioral Assessment 12(5):5-31 (1990).
6. Groth-Marnat, G., and Schumaker, J., Computer-based psychological testing: Issues and guidelines, Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 59(2):257-263 (1989).
7. Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., Erdman, H. P., et al., Comparison of computer- and interviewer-administered versions of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 38(12):1304-1311 (1987).
8. Hubbard, R. L., Bray, R. M., and Croddock, S. G., Issues in the assessment of multiple drug use among drug treatment clients, in Strategies for Research on Drugs of Abuse (M. Braude and H. M. Ginzburg, eds.), National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, 1986.
9. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed. revised, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, 1987.
10. California Society of Addiction Medicine, Collaborative Study of Addiction Treatment Outcome Workshop, Los Angeles, CA, 1992, unpublished.
11. Siegel, D. G., Podgor, M. J., and Remaley, N. A., Acceptable values of kappa for comparison of two groups, Am. J. Epidemiology 135:571-578 (1992).