The effects of hazardous waste taxes on waste generation and disposal

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 199-217

  Sigman, Hilary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030066332     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1996.0014     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. California State Board of Equalization, "Hazardous Waste Disposal Fees Study," The Board, Sacramento, CA, 1988.
2. Congressional Budget Office (CBO), "Hazardous Waste Management: Recent Changes and Policy Alternatives," Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1985.
3. Congressional Budget Office (CBO), "Empirical Analysis of U.S. Hazardous Waste Generation, Management, and Regulatory Costs," Congressional Budget Office Staff Working Paper, 1985.
4. R. E. Deyle and S. I. Bretschneider, Public policy impacts on the generation and disposal of hazardous waste in New York State, J. Air Waste Management Assoc. 40, 462-468 (1990).
5. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), "The Feasibility and Desirability of Alternative Tax Systems for Superfund: CERCLA Section 301(a)(1)(G) Study, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1984.
6. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), "Summary of State Capacity, Volume I: Commercial Facilities," Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1989.
7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), "National Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators and Treatment, Storage, Disposal, and Recycling Facilities," Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1991.
8. D. Fullerton and T. C. Kinnaman, Garbage, recycling, and illicit burning or dumping, J. Environ. Econom. Management, 29, 78-91 (1995).
9. M. A. Fuss, The demand for energy in Canadian manufacturing: An example of the estimation of production structures with many inputs, J. Econometrics 5, 89-116 (1977).
10. R. W. Hahn, An evaluation of options for reducing hazardous waste, Harvard Environ. Law Review 12, 201-230 (1988).
11. B. Hall and M. L. Kerr, "1991-1992 Green Index," Island Press, Washington, DC, 1991.
12. J. T. Hamilton, Politics and social costs: estimating the impact of collective action on hazardous waste facilities, RAND J. Econom. 24, 101-125 (1992).
13. ICF Incorporated, "Survey of Selected Firms in the Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Industry, 1986-1987," Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1988.
14. B. J. Kim, R. H. Reuter, R. T. Williams, C. R. Tanner, C. S. Gee, and J. B. Bandy, "An Analysis of Army Hazardous Waste Disposal Cost Data," USACERL Technical Report N-91/17, 1991.
15. National Research Council, "Environmental Epidemiology: Public Health and Hazardous Wastes, Vol. 1," National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1991.
16. D. M. Pekelney, Hazardous waste generation, transportation, reclamation, and disposal: California's manifest system and the case of halogenated solvents, J. Hazardous Mater. 23, 293-315 (1990).
17. D. M. Pekelney, Chemical solvent regulation: Reducing or substituting environmental hazards? UCLA School of Public Health, mimeo, 1993.
18. M. A. Reams, P. H. Templet, and G. P. Kemp, Hazardous waste taxes in Louisiana and their effect on importation, Hazardous Waste Hazardous Mater. 10, 97-104 (1993).
19. C. S. Russell, Economic incentives in the management of hazardous wastes, Columbia J. Environ. Law 13, 257-274 (1988).
20. R. N. Stavins, "Project 88 - Round II. Incentives for Action: Designing Market-based Environmental Strategies," Offices of Senators Heinz and Wirth, Washington, DC, 1991.
21. A. Watabe, On economic incentives for reducing hazardous waste generation, J. Environ. Econom. Management 23, 154-160 (1992).
22. K. Wolf and F. Camm, "Policies for Chlorinated Solvent Waste - An Exploratory Application of a Model of Chemical Life Cycles and Interactions," RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA, 1987.