Large-sized bladders reduce intravesical pressure and fluid absorption during turp using the suprapubic trocar

Urologia Internationalis

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 28-32

  Zhang, Weiben ^a   Ekengren, Jan ^b   Hahn, Robert G ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM SÖDER HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bladder physiology; Height; Irrigating fluid bags; Prostate

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER; BLADDER IRRIGATION; BLADDER PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HEIGHT; HUMAN; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION;

ABSORPTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ETHANOL; HUMANS; IRRIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATECTOMY; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 0030066151     PISSN: 00421138     EISSN: 14230399     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000282804     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ekengren J, Zhang WB, Hahn RG: The effects of bladder capacity and height of fluid bag on intravesical pressure during transurethral resection of the prostate, Eur Urol 1995:27:26- 30.
2. Hahn RG: Calculation of irrigant absorption by measurement of breath alcohol level during transurethral resection of the prostate, Br J Urol 1991:68:390-393.
3. Hahn RG, Ekengren J: Absorption of irrigating fluid and height of fluid bag during transurethral resection of the prostate, Br J Urol 1993; 72:80-83.
4. Hahn RG: Ethanol monitoringof cxtravascular absorption of irrigating fluid, Br J Urol 1993; 72:766-769.
5. Taylor RO, Maxson ES, Carter FH, Bethard WF, Prentiss RJ: Volumetric, gravimetric and radioisotopic determination of fluid transfer in transurethral prostatectomy, J Urol 1958:79: 490-499.
6. Ekengren J, Hahn RG: Continuous versus intermittent flow irrigation in transurethral resection of the prostate, Urology 1994:43:328- 332.
7. Holmqvist BG, Holm B, Ohlin P: Comparative study of the Iglesias and the suprapubic drainage technique for transurethral resection, Br J Urol 1979;51:378-381.
8. Mosegaard A, Madsen P: Trocar cystostomy during transurethral prostatic resection, Urology 1974;6:735-740.
9. Reuter M, Reuter HJ: Prevention of irrigant absorption during TURP: Continuous low-pressure irrigation, Int Urol Nephrol 1978; 10: 293-300.
10. Hahn RG, Algotsson L-Â, Torncbrandt K: Comparison of ethanol absorption during continuous and intermittent flow irrigation during transurethral resection, Scand J Urol Nephrol 1990;24:24-30.
11. Stephenson TP, Latto P, Bradley D, Hayward M, Jones A: Comparison between continuous flow and intermittent flow transurethral resection in 40 patients presenting with acute retention, Br J Urol 1980;52:523-525.
12. Flechner SM, Williams RD: Continuous flow and conventional rcscctoscope methods in transurethral prostatectomy: Comparative study, J Urol 1982;127:257-259.
13. Rabe HB, de Kock MLS: Transurethral prostatectomy: Studies with different intravesical pressures, South Afr Med J 1982:61:778-780.
14. Hahn R, Berlin T, Johansson H, Lcwenhaupt A: Changes in intravesical pressure during irrigating fluid absorption in transurethral prostatic surgery, Urol Res 1988:16:281-285.
15. Madsen PO, Nabcr KG: The importance of the pressure in the prostatic fossa and absorption of irrigating fluid during transurethral resection of the prostate, J Urol 1973;109:446-452