Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 45-49

  Murakami, Takashi ^a   Eishi, Kiyoyuki ^a   Nakano, Seiji ^a   Kobayashi, Junjirou ^a   Sasako, Yoshikado ^a   Isobe, Fumitaka ^a   Kosakai, Yoshio ^a   Kito, Yoshitugu ^a   Kawashima, Yasunaru ^a  

^a NATIONAL CEREBRAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CALCIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOCARDITIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THROMBOEMBOLISM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CAUSE OF DEATH; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030065170     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Daenen W, Noyez L, Lesaffre E. The Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve: results in 473 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;46:536-541
2. Gallo I, Nistal F, Revuelta JM, et al. Incidence of primary valve failure with Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985:278-280
3. Frater RWM, Salomon NW, Painer WG, et al. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve: intermediate results. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:764-771
4. Meyns B, Szecsi J, Flameng F, et al. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: mid-term clinical results. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:66-70
5. Cosgrove DM, Lyte BW, Gill CC, et al. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;89:358-368
6. Perier P, Mihaileanu S, Fabiani JN, et al. Long-term evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position. Cardiac Surg 1991;6:589-594
7. Aupart M, Neville P, Dreyfus X, et al. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: intermediate results in 420 patients. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 1994;8:277-280
8. Tajima K, Kawazoe K, Fujii N, et al. Middle term follow-up and comparative study of valve replacement with four kinds of new model bovine pericardial xenografts. Kyobu-Geka 1990;43:438-443
9. Gabbay S, Kadam P, Factor S, et al. Do heart valve bioprosthesis degenerate for metabolic or mechanical reasons? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;95:208-215
10. Jamieson WRE, Burr LH, Munro AI, et al. Cardiac valve replacement in the elderly: clinical performance of biological prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:173-185
11. Jamieson WRE, Tyers GF, Miyagishima RT, et al. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis. Comparison of standard and supra-annular prosthesis at 7 years. Circulation 1991;(Suppl 3):145-152
12. Nistal F, Artinano E, Gallo I. Primary tissue valve degeneration in glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine bioprosthesis: Hancock I versus Carpentier-Edwards at 4- to 7-years' follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;42:568-572
13. Perier P, Deloch A, Chauvaud S, et al. A 10 year comparison of mitral valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Hancock porcine bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:54-59
14. Jamieson WRE, Tyers GF, Janusz MT et al. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprosthesis for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis. Can J Cardiol 1991;7:181-188
15. Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzuco A, et al. Pregnancy in patients with a porcine valve bioprosthesis. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:1051
16. Salazar E, Zajarias A, Gutierrez N, et al. The problem of cardiac valve prosthesis, anticoagulants, and pregnancy. Circulation 1984;70:169-177