Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part III. Comparison of old versus new design MicroCell chambers

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 446-447

  Johnson, J E ^a   Boone, W R ^a   Blackhurst, D W ^a  

^a GREENVILLE HOSPITAL SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

beads; CASA; counting chambers; MicroCell chamber; quality control; validation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY TEST; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY;

EID: 0030064243     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58115-1     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. J.E. Johnson W.R. Boone D.W. Blackhurst Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part I. Comparison of counting chambers Fertil Steril 65 1995 150 155
2. J.E. Johnson W.R. Boone D.W. Blackhurst Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer Fertil Steril 65 1995 156 159
3. R.O. Davis D.F. Katz Standardization and comparability of CASA instruments J Androl 13 1992 81 86
4. W.R. Boone S.S. Shapiro Quality control in the in vitro fertilization laboratory Theriogenology 33 1990 23 50