The relative afferent pupillary defect and a novel method of fusion recovery with the Worth 4-dot test

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 171-175

  Johnson, Lenworth N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT; AGED; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION;

EID: 0030059023     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100130165009     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Levatin P Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol. 1959;62:768-779
2. Thompson HS Afferent pupillary defects, pupillary findings associated with defects of the afferent arm of the pupillary light reflex arc. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966,62 860-873.
3. Johnson LN, Hill RA, Bartholomew MJ. Correlation of afferent pupillary defect with visual field loss on automated perimetry Ophthalmology. 1988,95:1649-1655
4. Kardon RH, Haupert CL, Thompson HS. The relationship between static perimetry and the relative afferent pupillary defect Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115: 351-356.
5. Forman S, Behrens MM, Odel JG, Spector RT, Hilal S Relative afferent pupillary defect with normal visual function. Arch Ophthalmol 1990,108:1074-1075.
6. Johnson LN. The effect of light intensity of measurement of the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;109 481-482
7. Thompson HS, Corbett JJ. Asymmetry of pupillomotor input. Eye 1991;5:36-39
8. Frank JW, France TD, Harrington J The Worth 4-dot test: is it really 'worthless'? Am Orthoptic J. 1981;31:68-71.
9. Johnson LN. Aminlari A, Sassani JW Effect of intermittent versus continuous patient monitoring on reliability indices during automated perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1993,100:76-84.
10. Hubel DH. Eye, Brain and Vision New York, NY. Scientific American Library; 1988:88-91, 137-157, 191-217
11. Crick F. The Astonishing Hypothesis The Scientific Search for the Soul. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co Inc: 1994 35-57, 71-78, 121-159, 177-199, 215-230.
12. Parks MM. Binocular vision In Duane TD, Jaeger EA, eds. Clinical Ophthalmology Philadelphia, Pa Harper & Row Publishers Inc; 1990,1:chaps 5 and 9.
13. Sadun AA, Bassi CJ, Lessell S. Why cataracts do not produce afferent pupillary defects. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;110:712-714
14. Heravian-Shandiz J, Douthwaite WA, Jenkins TCA Binocular interaction with neutral density filters as measured by the visual evoked response Optom Vis Sc: 1991:68.801-806.
15. Froehlich J, Kaufman DI. Effect of decreased retinal illumination on simultaneously recorded pattern electroretinogram and visual-evoked potentials Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32.310-318.
16. Katsumi O, Tanino T, Hirose T Objective evaluation of binocular function using the pattern reversal visual evoked response, II effect of mean luminosity Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1986 64 199-205.
17. Lawwill T, Biersdorf WR Binocular rivalry and visual evoked responses Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1968;7.378-385.
18. Kardon R, Moore P, Selky A Variability of the relative afferent pupillary defect: ARVO abstracts Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994,35(suppl 4):2059.